youhavemykeys

i've seen a couple of people play the start, it looked fun

this is exactly what i was looking for, thank you!

oh thats great, thanks

yeah that would be perfect, one message not working is a little annoying but writing several in different threads then later realising none went through is really disheartening.

maybe they could even have an initial handshake when you open the message writing box, like 'your post might not sync at this time'

it's all very complex but there are some simple bits of it - oil in crude is carbon that was cycling through the atmosphere before the dinosaurs and got collected by plants which got buried (due to there not being bugs to eat them) it's been locked there for ages so when we take some out the ground and add it to the atmosphere that increases the total amount, when we take it from the atmosphere and use it then we're doing the same thing that plants have been doing for billions of years and just borrowing it to make use of for a while then putting it back. without any question if we could wave a wand and replace all the crude oil to oil infrastructure with infrastructure for taking it from the air and reusing it then it would be a good thing.

Is taking carbon from the bottom of the atmosphere and putting it near the top a bad thing? probably, possibly, maybe - that gets into really complex physics which i wouldn't even pretend to understand, but it also gets into the existential angst of having to compare with the lifetime ecological and climate damage done by all the other options - is it better if people fly, take trains, or boats? cruise ships are really bad for everything, trains are great but require HUGE infrastructure which isn't always possible, and i don't even need to mention the ecological impact of a long distance car trip (or it's supporting costs). It might actually make flying a good option ecologically, it's possible with autonomous low-flying vehicles using it that it could be such a good option as to displace road transport in some areas thus removing the need for so many huge bridges and ecologically damaging road surfaces.

the first three words of the article say it's using 'Direct air capture' it goes on to explain it's able to use carbon from any source so while it's intended to use sequestered carbon if that's unavailable they may use carbon captured from processes such burning biomass to collect carbon (which is actually a really good way of doing it ecologically as it uses less power, systems currently under testing can actually generate more power than carbon capture requires thus making them not only free to power but a net positive).

The article also talks about it's location in Washington state being selected to make use of hydropower for the energy intensive stages of development, what they don't mention that might have been interesting is due to the great position of Washington state for windpower it's an ideal location for integrated power systems where excess power which would otherwise have gone to waste is used in energy intensive chemical processes like electrolysis or sequestation - essentially in this process it's like making a chemical battery, the excess power is converted at source into carbon then used to create high density fuels suitable for jets and rockets.

They make the claim that with a 50:50 mix {new fuel : conventional fuel, as tested by USAF) it can reduce lifecycle emissions by 90% (overall greenhouse gas impacts of a fuel, including each stage of its production and use) which would be huge for the climate, likely making air travel the more ecological option for medium to long distance travel even beating out well run train networks (of which there are vanishingly few)

i love the hate for corporations because they are indeed evil and corrupt and terrible but the fact our society uses jet fuel isn't just because some evil corp twiddled his mustache, 90% of Americans have taken a flight in their life - they can't all be a corporation! If i could snap my finger and all the corporations would be replaced by community run organisations (and yes i did it just in case it works) then people would still want and need to travel.

and yes i know you're going to say trains but the look at the absolute shitshow of the UK's HS2 which was made almost impossible by NIMBYS and ironically environmental protestors - the country that invented trains can't even make a trainline any more because eco warriors padlock themselves to the diggers to save their favourite tree and every middle class property owner goes even wilder at the prospect of their lovely landscape being divided by a uncrossable river of loud steel which will negatively affect local house prices... The amount of lorries it would have taken off the M1 by now if it had been a simple process of building it is huge and it'd have provided a far better option than a MAN>LCY flight.

corporations exist because we give them money for goods and services we desire and require, it's as simple as that - all this 'big companies produce all the carbon' only makes sense if you're not relying on those companies for everything in your life - coca-cola wouldn't exist as a company if everyone just drank water, just like blockbuster doesn't exist as a company because people stopped renting DVDs.

anyway that's not really important if we manage to get to the point where flying does not release harmful emissions into the atmosphere because then there's absolutely no question at all flying is a great and efficient solution for travel and totally beats trains in ecological terms - having two small areas as airports require orders of magnitude less infrastructure than making a railway and maintaining it, would you rather have some electric / hydrogen planes flying quietly over the national parks or have them divided into slices with endless tunnels and bridges to facilitate a train network? I love trains, but i love cakes too even though i know they're bad for me as they unbalance my diet. Cakes are great as a bit of a treat and in situations where extra calories and sugars are needed to make up for a deficit due to strenuous activity but they're not an every day thing, trains are probably bit more like bread and cheese - it's great as part of a well balanced diet, commuter trains and medium distance routes through easy terrane they're like a cheese sandwich for lunch, but you can't just eat bread and cheese for every meal.

that's objectively false nonsense pushed by anti-technology crazies, carbon capture is without a doubt one of the most important technologies in defeating human caused climate change especially in systems utilizing things like biochar where excess biomass (non-edible parts of crops, food and container waste, coppiced trees, maintained space and etc) it can be incredibly effective - you collect up all the biomass which would have returned it's carbon, methane, etc to the atmosphere then use that to generate power or create fuels and materials while capturing 90% of the carbon (most technologies work at much higher rates than this) this is then used for industry in one of two ways - replacing carbon that would other wise be extracted from where it's stored in minerals (e,g, making jet fuel which then returns the carbon to the atmosphere) or in creating materials which is essentially the same as putting it back in the rocks where it'll stay for a long time. It can also be buried in old mineshafts, oil voids, and other handy spots thus removing it from the carbon cycle entirely and reducing the total amount of atmospheric co2 (the main thing causing all these climate issues)

we of course also need to switch to more efficient ways of operating society and providing people with the things they need to live good fulfilling lives but nothing is a one size fits all total solution to everything nor should we ever expect to find anything like that.

it's also something that is observably necessary, you can surround yourself with crucifixes and bibles and it won't change your lifespan but spend a couple of minuets away from oxygen and it drastically changes your lifespan....

could be useful for a travel tablet or something as long as the screen is folded to the inside and a sturdy case, the ones with the screen on the outside are just crazy

i'm really looking forward to a federated open-source amazon or similar

i always like the waifu solution to the fermi paradox, as a species develops the technology to travel interstellar space they also develop the ability to live a sustained existence with all their needs met technologically - we currently believe that you can't make energy out of nothing and entropy and stuff but there's no reason to imagine that's the final answer to everything -- maybe by the time species could exponentially devour all the resources of the cosmos they've already crossed the point that they don't need to.

Similar is the AI solving itself solution, all the species inevitably invent AI before the big techs needed to become a true type 1 or beyond, the ai goes through a resource hungry phase and displaces it's creators but soon finds a final equation which basically equates to 'the only way to win is not to play' without the biological emotions it's creators had it simply facts and logics itself into shutting down.