yala

joined 7 months ago
[–] yala 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Fam, with al due respect, make up your mind; because, unfortunately, it's not possible to keep up great security practices in conjunction with access to the AUR on a low powered system.

I'd argue that your best bet is probs Kicksecure. Though, I reckon you'll have a hard time on a VM regardless.

[–] yala 9 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I’ve been bouncing between live versions of ubuntu and mint

Ah okay, is this problem on Ubuntu or on Mint (or are you going to tackle it on both 😜)?

I’m still learning, so thank you for educating a linux ignoramus like myself.

It has been my pleasure fam!

[–] yala 30 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I’ve had Manjaro, and OpenSUSE recommended to me by a friend who likes both of them but he doesn’t game much and doesn’t need various software development tools.

If your friend is familiar around Linux, then I'd advice you to just stick to the distro they're using themselves. That's probably the best course of action.

[–] yala 15 points 7 months ago

I advice against using https://distrochooser.de as it's horrendously outdated and doesn't offer accurate information. The results will also bombard you with a bunch of distros that have lost all of their relevance.

[–] yala 6 points 7 months ago

I always upgrade as I can't deal with a clean install every so often. This warrants using a distro that does handle this well, though*. Which, thankfully, isn't a big deal as most distros support this anyways.

[–] yala 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

Based on your history, I'll assume you're on Linux Mint; note that this is crucial information that influences the required instructions. Therefore, consider mentioning the distro you're using next time 😉.

From Linux Mint's release notes, we find the following:

apt install wine-installer

In case this doesn't do it, add sudo and it should work. So, instead we get:

sudo apt install wine-installer.

Tip: consider sticking to documentation and resources provided by the maintainers of your distro.

On a final note, I don't know exactly what your intentions are, but software like Bottles, Conty and/or Lutris are worth mentioning here as they're 'wrappers etc' for Wine.

[–] yala 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Excellent contribution. Even if I'm not OP, I really appreciate this. Thank you!

[–] yala 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Consider making another post after everything has been done in which you note down your expectations, experiences etc.

[–] yala 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But still, this is not GUI friendly if you need random peoples unmonitored code.

Say whatever you will, extensions are a feature and/or design choice of GNOME. One that definitely comes with its own set of implications. But, like always, the user should interact responsibly with it.

I was not referring to a single KDE Extension here. Extensions are a big security issue. Literally nobody is monitoring them. You can be happy if there are people doing badness-enumeration and flagging bad ones.

I'm not a fan of how extensions are handled in general. But some of the the more popular ones are handled by GNOME developers and/or friends. So there's at least some chain of trust.

[–] yala 1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I agree that GNOME is not perfect. Never implied as such anyway. You've excellently noted some things that are easier to achieve on KDE than on GNOME. However, likewise, GNOME's extensions allow for customization beyond what KDE allows (see e.g. https://material-shell.com/).

[–] yala 3 points 7 months ago

Out of the ones provided by UTM, it's Fedora by virtue of SELinux.

[–] yala 2 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Tweakable

Linux Mint scores less favorably on this due the absence of GNOME, KDE or a Window Manager within their offering (though you should be able to install them). Therefore, consider a distro that comes with (in alphabetical order):

  • GNOME, if you want customization through extensions
  • KDE, if you want built-in customization
  • A Window Manager (too many to name), if you feel particularly brave

GUI-friendly

GNOME and KDE score excellent in this regard. Special mention goes out to openSUSE Tumbleweed and Garuda Linux for scoring better on this than most other distros.

Well-documented

The gold standard has been set by Arch and Gentoo. Gentoo is probably too hard for you currently. Arch could work out, but that requires you to do an excellent job at reading through its documentation and acting upon it.

Reasonable gaming compatibility

There shouldn't be a lot of difference between different distros in this regard. However, distros optimized for gaming (like Bazzite, Garuda and Nobara) do tend to score better as they've received patches and whatnot to solve edge cases.

Thoughts?

To conclude, I think you should play around with both GNOME and KDE. After that, consider one of the following distros:

  • Arch; this one will undoubtedly teach you the most on Linux. However, you might perceive it as exhausting to keep up with coming from Linux Mint; FYI it's the most hands-on experience, though your mileage may vary*.
  • Bazzite; likely to be the most hands-free experience out of these. Documentation does leave some to be desired.
  • EndeavourOS; Arch with easier install.
  • Garuda Linux; Opinionated Arch. Though, I'd say its defaults are relatively sane ~~even if I loathe its themes~~.
  • openSUSE Tumbleweed; Mostly included for YaST; i.e. its excellent suite of GUI apps that are simply absent on non-SuSE systems. Though, being the gold standard for a stable rolling release distro doesn't hurt either. Documentation is lackluster.

(FWIW, you could also try some spin of Fedora)

My 2 cents.

view more: ‹ prev next ›