yala

joined 7 months ago
[–] yala 6 points 7 months ago

Until its drivers are completely open source, Nvidia will continue to cause trouble every once in a while.

Therefore, if you liked Sway, then don't leave it expecting to be a lot better elsewhere.

However, Hyprland's community is pretty big and I can only be positive regarding the pace of its development. Therefore, if anything, Hyprland might be able to offer a solution. But, don't forget what I said earlier*.

[–] yala 30 points 7 months ago

Linux Mint Xfce Edition should be right up your alley.

[–] yala 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Technically, if you would have been on Fedora Atomic, you could have just rebased to the Kinoite branch. Perhaps even created a new user so your home folder doesn't get populated by unwanted stuff. And, afterwards, you could rebase back to whatever your original branch was.

Furthermore, downloading any distro that defaults to KDE and offers a live environment should be able to offer you a KDE experience within the live environment as well.

[–] yala 48 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)
[–] yala 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I’m still on the hunt for a distro where everything I need is easy to install. I don’t think any exist, primarily because GPU drivers suuuuuuuck, especially when you need CUDA or ROCm to work.

Have you looked at the opinionated images by uBlue, i.e. Aurora, Bazzite and Bluefin? FWIW, e.g. for Bazzite, AMD's ROCM OpenCL/HIP run-times are fully supported OOTB and there's a workaround for CUDA. It does a lot of good stuff in general. Heck, I'd argue they're one of the most handsfree and easy experiences you may find on Linux.

[–] yala 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I expected this to be more feasible on the Intel models for whatever reason.

Historically, in the past few years, for devices that support coreboot, we've had more Intel models than AMD models. So perhaps that's were your hunch stems from.

[–] yala 22 points 7 months ago (3 children)

We actually already have an experimental coreboot port on the FW 13 AMD.

And, from my understanding, Framework has sent over a device to make this possible.

However, I don't know if it will ever get official support. Though, surely, I hope it will.

[–] yala 42 points 7 months ago (9 children)

Support for coreboot can't come soon enough. My fingers are already tingling in excitement for that day.

[–] yala 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

Unfortunately, I can't take this seriously as 1% lows and additional variance due to difference in DE haven't been accounted for.

Furthermore, you bet that Tuxedo OS has done a splendid job at optimizing performance on a device that's sold by Tuxedo. Therefore, I wonder if it's even a fair comparison to begin with.

[–] yala 4 points 7 months ago

OS is xubuntu 24.04

Ubuntu defaults to ufw. That, by itself, justifies the use of ufw in your case.

[–] yala 3 points 7 months ago

IIUC, Q4OS only shares its source code on request. Furthermore, the Windows installer is a fork (or somewhat based on) WubiUEFI.

[–] yala 2 points 7 months ago

Q4OS still has a .exe installer though.

TIL. This is pretty cool. I wonder how much effort it would cost to make this a viable option for most of the popular distros.

view more: ‹ prev next ›