Milwaukee. I started off my collection with their corded equipment, so I followed the brand when I wanted to get into the cordless tools.
Removing the weight verification would make me reconsider self-checkout machines. There are other stores that I frequent where the weight verification is off, but my grocery store seems to be the only one to keep it enabled.
The part that grinds my gears is if I don’t allow the machine to verify the weight and scan the next item, I have to sit through the entire TTS message that explains what I’m doing wrong before I can correct my mistake and move on.
Any time I’m buying more than 3 items, I typically just go straight to a human-operated register.
The grocery store near me has the most annoying security feature on their self-checkout machines. After you scan your item, it must be placed on the checkout shelf before you can do anything else. If the weight is “unexpected”, you’re stuck asking for help. If you have a full cart of items, you can’t parallelize tasks because of this deadlock; the machine refuses to scan the next item until your current purchase is on the checkout shelf and verified.
You can follow this issue for the same feature request.
In the same issue, there’s a reference to a potential workaround. I haven’t tried it, but from skimming the post, it seems to require less effort while not being fully automatic.
It seems like you’re the first one here to search and subscribe to it. When I searched for it, it came up immediately. At this point, it could be a caching issue, but it’s hard to say when I’m not seeing the same issue.
Looking forward to the next season!
For what it’s worth: other large instances are also intentionally delaying upgrade plans until 0.18.1.
If you’re viewing it from a mobile device, it won’t display.
The URL for mod mail gives me this: /message/compose?to=/r/math.
If you’re unable to find an answer, you could resort to modmail to see if you can get a message (canned or otherwise) about their plans.
Relative links seem to be the best way to accomplish what you’re looking to do. So, in your example, it’s /c/x@y.org.
Reference: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/6063
vacuumpizzas
joined 1 year ago
Would either Calckey or Misskey be a good fit for what you’re looking for?