self

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] self@awful.systems 18 points 8 months ago

finally we’ve created the AI girlfriend from the famous movie “don’t create an AI girlfriend, it’s kind of a fucked up thing to do”

[–] self@awful.systems 8 points 8 months ago

and of course it was another throwaway account

[–] self@awful.systems 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There’s just no nuance in these discussions and you’re a perfect example of that

the incredible nuance of pretending that basic editor features can’t be done without AI and ignoring a 30% increase in greenhouse gasses (and the entire field of algorithmic complexity) because something something fossil fuels something something progress. you fucking shithead.

it’s time for you to take your leave. but with your time spent not posting in this thread, if you’re actually worried about reactionaries (and we can tell you’re not), might I recommend looking up what your best boy Sam Altman’s been doing with Peter Thiel and the rest of his fash friends? it’s a real easy search to do, but you won’t

[–] self@awful.systems 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

syntax completion has existed since 1957, and templating (or macros that implement templates) has been in editors long enough I don’t think anyone remembers when they got added (but here’s TECO (1962) anyway. the implementations of these things that run inside your editor are lightweight, predictable, and don’t increase carbon emissions by 30%, and it’s really weird that you’re in this thread cosplaying as a programmer but somehow don’t know basic shit about how code’s written, actually??? why is that, I wonder.

yes, computing systems use energy

come the fuck off it. so much of computer science involves studying algorithmic efficiency, something you just tried to talk past. it’s how we know that the regular expressions and push-down automata we implement in editors to do fast efficient syntax completion are a better fucking idea than using some shit that does the same thing less reliably and consumes so much fucking energy doing it that it increases greenhouse emissions by 30 fucking percent

[–] self@awful.systems 12 points 8 months ago (12 children)

how could we possibly be critical of the technology that at best replicates basic editor functionality (templating, syntax completion), outputs wildly incorrect code, and burns rainforests?

[–] self@awful.systems 11 points 8 months ago

I dug into their post history and god you’re fucking right

[–] self@awful.systems 11 points 8 months ago

don’t know why you got banned

[–] self@awful.systems 21 points 8 months ago (5 children)

you’ll love what happens next

[–] self@awful.systems 18 points 8 months ago (6 children)

so to summarize, your only contributions to this thread are to go “well uh you just don’t know how LLMs work” while providing absolutely no detail of your own, and reporting our regulars for “Civility” when they rightly called you out for being a fucking idiot who’s way out of their depth

how fucking embarrassing for you

[–] self@awful.systems 6 points 8 months ago

that’s great thanks

[–] self@awful.systems 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

it’s always fucking “boilerplate” with these assholes, isn’t it? I don’t know how so many people got into this field and didn’t figure out the template, snippet, or macro engines in their editors

[–] self@awful.systems 13 points 8 months ago (4 children)

May I ask, what evidence are you hoping to see in particular?

holy fuck shut the fuck up

view more: ‹ prev next ›