oh fuck you crossed the libertarian streams, now the thread’s gonna be destroyed by bears
fortunately, notepad++ hasn’t (yet) enshittified. it’s fucking weird we can’t say the same about the original though
in before some fucking asshole posts “but how can it be a monopoly when it’s 4 companies colluding to control the entire market HMMMM? do you just hate capitalism and success?”
it’s very bad news if so — we won’t even have the option to escape these assholes if they own all of the fabric of the network
fucking hell. it’s always this exact evil shit from these assholes, isn’t it? and every time they do this (and I’ve seen them do this same shit in my city over and over) they seem amazed when the unhoused people they’re victimizing don’t just fucking die like they hoped they would. instead they survive by any means necessary, like any person would; like any of us would. and every time it’s a fucking mystery to shitheads like Newsom why homelessness got “worse”
in fact, fuck it, I don’t want any of this utter bullshit in my database
your good faith evaporated almost as fast as my patience. fuck along now
alright
“Spanish or Dominican or whatever.”
nothing like this or that can be paraphrased to this appears in the article
Ok… How was that in any way relevant to a story about a different friend sending you an AI birthday greeting?
robert is describing how he, as a Blind author, experienced both his best birthday message and his worst one. he illustrated why he thought his Dominican friend’s message was beautiful and contrasted it with his other friend’s utterly thoughtless AI-generated message, which that friend sent even though they knew Robert’s views on AI
none of this is particularly objectionable unless you’re a big AI fan or you dislike interracial affection and you’re reaching for a problem to have with, as I mentioned, a Blind author affectionately describing his friend’s voice
yep, you can fuck off with this bad faith shit too
imagine if you read the post instead of coming in here with a weird fucking accusation
no, the article isn’t clickbait if it accurately paraphrases a source in a tone you disagree with
no, it’s not ragebait if reading it made you angry and you wish it wasn’t true, but it very obviously is
good talk, thanks
ah, that sounds like my post over on mastodon