samxavia

joined 7 months ago
[–] samxavia@mastodon.social 1 points 7 months ago

Because some of the big users on those sorts of platforms have really good content that can be helpful and annoying to login to a tracking monster platform like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter or any other main stream social media.

[–] samxavia@mastodon.social 2 points 7 months ago

I would love for more activity for niche communities

[–] samxavia@mastodon.social 0 points 7 months ago

Creators on TikTok in America, if they pass the bill to ban TikTok. What looks likely.

@loops is trying to be some sort of 30 second fediverse alternative.

[–] samxavia@mastodon.social 3 points 7 months ago

I'll try to do just that then. Stay active and make this place full of content for people to enjoy.

[–] samxavia@mastodon.social 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Creators often have Subreddits and places people want to interact with.

I was more talking about things like PeerTube and the upcoming @loops what is a TikTok Alternative for the Fediverse.

[–] samxavia@mastodon.social 1 points 7 months ago

It's a Social network, not a social media. Most people don't know the difference

[–] samxavia@mastodon.social 1 points 7 months ago (6 children)

I would like to see the Fediverse grow overtime, also we haven't had to deal with a Decentralised network across the internet before, who knows what may happen.

[–] samxavia@mastodon.social 0 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I was more asking of the things that may replace platforms like TikTok connected to the Fediverse in the future suck as @loops

I understand not earning money from Mastodon or Lemmy, Just like the Video side of the Fediverse needs a way to earn money without the normal ways.

[–] samxavia@mastodon.social 6 points 7 months ago

I agree with the Ads side of things. That's why I was asking if there was any other sort of model that people could use. I guess donations are probably the only thing that people could widely use.

[–] samxavia@mastodon.social 2 points 7 months ago

Aww, forget that blackjack and the Hookers too.

[–] samxavia@mastodon.social 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah, that doesn't seem right. Correction 1: I guess, for instance, they may become pay monthly just to have upkeep and moderation covered themselves. That would be an ok thing in my eyes.

But for content creators and stuff, a pay-to-view system isn't really a good idea. Guess it would have to be done through donations instead, as that's the only thing that sort of makes sense.

view more: ‹ prev next ›