redditrassholes9344

joined 1 month ago
[–] redditrassholes9344 1 points 1 month ago

Well there's always the alternative form of protest. What blackouts are is a form of peaceful protest. Protest that is meant to be a nuisance but doesn't get people hurt. Reddit does have experience though with the other kind of protest, as seen in this article it's very much not pleasant. That was one group too, imagine if a meaningful number of Redditors tried to breach them, it would be a nightmare for them, no matter how good they claim their security is.

[–] redditrassholes9344 1 points 1 month ago

The violent ones produce change one way or another. They're significantly less desirable for leaders, and that's kind of the point.

[–] redditrassholes9344 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People haven't been using the alternative, and that's the problem. Reddit and tech giants have grown complicit. They do not believe people would do it to them, or they think they could survive thousands of people trying to do it to them, if one can then many can.

[–] redditrassholes9344 3 points 1 month ago

That's not a good method though on it's own, there needs to be effort to undermine them. And since they don't want to do peaceful protests, the only option left are the more violent and less legal ones. The ones that compromise their platform and its data.

[–] redditrassholes9344 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The old alternative is better IMO, makes change happen one way or another. Specifically the unsanctioned, and non-peaceful protests. Boycotts don't work in the days of ad-revenue, since ad-revenue funded companies have immunity from user dissatisfaction in that regard (can replace a substantial amount of users with bots that look at ads and they still get ad-revenue).

What we need are old-fashioned style pitchforks and fire protests against them, but in the digital age, using cyberwarfare, like this.

(reposted because SJW deleted my others)

[–] redditrassholes9344 2 points 1 month ago

Exactly, they've only decided to cut off peaceful and legal protest, they don't get a say though in non-legal or non-peaceful protests, especially involving cyber attacks against them.

reposted because SJW (fitting name) deleted all my old ones.

[–] redditrassholes9344 3 points 1 month ago

Peaceful protest, non peaceful or non legal protest is allowed only on the merit people decide to do it, regardless of what kind of mind games they try and use to stop it. If this happened once, it can happen again, just in different ways.

Sh.itjustworks deleted my comments so I'm reposting them.

[–] redditrassholes9344 3 points 1 month ago

Hopefully he won't, Reddit may seem more powerful in this scenario, but they aren't invulnerable to threats or attacks. Hopefully enough angry people decide to do what's necessary when the time comes.

[–] redditrassholes9344 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is not a smart choice, they do know that the alternative to peaceful protests like this is violent protest right? They want to challenge that or do they think it won't be done because it's "illegal", that didn't stop these guys now did it?

[–] redditrassholes9344 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

that's auto-moderation for you, really gives high hopes for the people claiming automated is the future.

[–] redditrassholes9344 1 points 1 month ago

sh.itjust.works just shat the bed LMAO

[–] redditrassholes9344 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Gonna require much more effort to do it, likely won't be considered peaceful or legal protests but it'll still be possible. Events like this offer a solution, a much more ugly and unpleasant one but a solution regardless. Every company has security holes, Reddit is no different. They can only deny the peaceful kind of protest, not the kind that would really hurt them.

Sh.itjust.works shitty automod removed my comments, so I'm reposting them on another account.

view more: next ›