reddit_ran

joined 1 year ago
[–] reddit_ran@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

That's a very interesting demo. Basically, right now what I can, I believe most people do, is to ask advices, aka script, to do a certain automatic job. As far as I know, most people will execute a function by himself and check the intermediate step before the critical steps. Let's say to, you know, revise the file in a file system or do some requests to external world.

Right now, the bottom line to me is, we have more time gaps here. When you spend some time waiting the system to respond, in our case, waiting the function to execute, or even for the functions, for the tokens to be complete. So we are, you know, asking the computer to do certain things and right now it cannot do it in one shot with high accuracy. So it basically involves many steps to achieve a relatively complex task. I'm actually inspired or I was thinking about how is that possible to have a well-defined a sequence of things to do in advancve and we talk to an agent and let an agent to do the job and once our human feedback is given to computer, then we jump to the next one as long as the background information is clear or consistent, it won't cost too much for this kind of parallel processing.

I would say it's involving more planning than my peers' workflow. So basically it requires one to clearly think about what exactly you want to achieve for a given section. It's a challenge, but it's interesting. I believe if we can do it in the right way, the results will be astonishing.

[–] reddit_ran@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

That's a very interesting demo. Basically, right now what I can, I believe most people do, is to ask advices, aka script, to do a certain automatic job. As far as I know, most people will execute a function by himself and check the intermediate step before the critical steps. Let's say to, you know, revise the file in a file system or do some requests to external world.

Right now, the bottom line to me is, we have more time gaps here. When you spend some time waiting the system to respond, in our case, waiting the function to execute, or even for the functions, for the tokens to be complete. So we are, you know, asking the computer to do certain things and right now it cannot do it in one shot with high accuracy. So it basically involves many steps to achieve a relatively complex task. I'm actually inspired or I was thinking about how is that possible to have a well-defined a sequence of things to do in advancve and we talk to an agent and let an agent to do the job and once our human feedback is given to computer, then we jump to the next one as long as the background information is clear or consistent, it won't cost too much for this kind of parallel processing.

I would say it's involving more planning than my peers' workflow. So basically it requires one to clearly think about what exactly you want to achieve for a given section. It's a challenge, but it's interesting. I believe if we can do it in the right way, the results will be astonishing.

[–] reddit_ran@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, this is pretty much a very complex idea, but it's commonly used in software development. I was wondering the usability of it. Maybe I'm just not seeing it right now, but I'm open to the discussion. Every time I have trouble with understanding those high tech, I always go back to the analogous version of the Zettelkasten system. In that case, if you have a new version of an old node, in that case you just write a new one. You can just start at the very beginning of that node to refer back to the old nodes. You don't have to say all the changes you make for that single node, as long as you're accumulating those new ideas and creating them together. As long as that process of making things together is evolving, then your system is okay. It introduce another layer of complexity without adding the value that is corresponding to that cost. If we go back to the basic philosophy of UNIX design, keep things simple as possible, then I'll put a big question mark on adapting this idea in my workflow right now.

[–] reddit_ran@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

What's your plan for synchronization issues? I mean, lots of guys, it's going to use primarily a desktop environment and I guess mainly using the phone to have a browser kind of functionalities as primary features. Okay, active test server will get access to synchronize in the future. I saw your information about what's your plan here? Are you going to use a syncthing or your own version of server?

[–] reddit_ran@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I do exactly the opposite for you, because the connection is so unstable and I have no control over it. TM-UX serves as a more robust way for the access.

but I do want to say that it's the drawback is there's not too much in a package I can you can use all it can be used but it's just so annoying to reinstall all those necessarily those requirements so hassle but the good point is I always adopt a banana conversion so it's as long as it's just basic it's okay and as soon as there's some complicated manipulations over the code definitely just had a local editing done and send it by you know you know you know synchronize server

[–] reddit_ran@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

uconsole, but the waiting time is somewhat Loooong now....