nsrxn

only one of them* is peer-reviewed. it doesn't actually support the claim that you're using it to support. The others are of dubious validity, but they also don't make the same very strong claim that you have.

edit: "them" was in reference to the comment a few back in the thread. the gish gallop of links that appeared after i wrote this comment all appear to be peer reviewed.

no, I'm examining your position, and the evidence provided, and found that they are insufficient.

turns out, everything is political, so, yes, it's all propaganda.

I haven't seen them, but I do know they work with the pentagon, so my guess is they aim to legitimize American hegemony and military spending

armies can't exist without hierarchy. as an anarchist, I seek to smash all unjust hierarchy.

it shows that the evidence you've provided doesn't actually support your claim

The most heinous people would again rise to be the most powerful, it’s just there would be no laws to mitigate the damage they could do.

can't accumulate power in a society without hierarchy.

I think a society that cages people is bad. it's a bad thing to put people in cages.

You're welcome to try to keep asking the people in power to change a system that inherently benefits them. I'll choose another path.

what good does it do to punish you? it's doesn't get my house back

ye'll tak' the high road, and I'll tak' the low road, And I'll be in Scotland afore ye,

you can do that whether the law exists or not. laws don't stop that. they do, however, disproportionately punish the already marginalized classes, while serving the interests of the powerful.