[-] nightauthor@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

The inability to self-soothe and therefore outburst when you have emotions is an executive dysfunction that is definitely part of ADHD. As others have said, the degree to which you feel the emotions may have other components, but the inability to quell or redirect your emotions is definitely a normal ADHD symptom.

[-] nightauthor@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Dr Russell Barkley, a respected researcher in the field of ADHD, basically states that there is a chemical deficiency in your brain that makes it physically impossible for it to simply 'be' better, and that things like behavior modification have been shown to be helpful... almost exclusively when the subject is also on medication. And even when environmental changes can make a difference, it tends to fall on those close to the ADHDer to help set up those accommodations, at least with children. However, with adults there exist the same struggles, just to a /slightly/ lesser extent.

[-] nightauthor@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah the $ implies the word dollar, in this case becoming “239 billion dollars”

[-] nightauthor@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

The best programmers are, 80/20 is life

[-] nightauthor@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

The issue was the use of a specific word, that is now uncouth, but with which OP identifies. They claim to not know the word had fallen out of favor. Other than the word itself, I don’t think there was anything wrong with the comment they left.

[-] nightauthor@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Dr Russell Barkley seems to be pretty against the idea of not taking meds. ADHD affects all parts of your life, and just because you don't have school doesnt mean you dont have ADHD. Your brain works better on the drugs, you can be more responsible, put more effort into your hobbies, and take better care of yourself if youre on your meds.

Unless theyve got some real reason for suggesting that, you should probably get a new dr.

14
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by nightauthor@kbin.social to c/fediverse@kbin.social

A small group of people were offended by a joke that unintentionally came across transphobic, and as a result this persons account was blacklisted. Even after getting the account reinstated, there were lasting complications with the state of the account (these probably technical issues) and the account was basically lost for good.

The 9th paragraph is where the incident is discussed.
What do yall think of this?

I've definitely been misunderstood myself, and it kinda sucks to think that my account could be lost for good due to a few reports, hasty banning, and some bug in the software.

[-] nightauthor@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Allowed? By whom? You know there are black people who abhor the use of the word no matter the person, right?

There are white people who use it freely, with black people.

[-] nightauthor@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Both are still better than “beehaw”

[-] nightauthor@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

There are cases where sarcasm doesn’t come through, because it’s only clear that it’s either sarcastic or crazy. And there’s a lot of crazy in the internet.

But i did feel this was clearly sarcastic.

[-] nightauthor@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah man, these fucking minorities need to pick themselves up by their great great grandparents bootstraps.

[-] nightauthor@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Yeah, like mounting plates for cameras…. Um, I think that’s the only place I’ve appreciated a slot screw

[-] nightauthor@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Gotta love a power trip

view more: next ›

nightauthor

joined 1 year ago