[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

assume your talking about https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0215545/, never saw it

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 days ago

I don't know who this guy is, but his response seems ultra shitty.

Wondering if everyone else thinks this would have been a reasonable response: "it was a different time, black face wasn't seen as raciest in the circles i kept, i apologize for any offence i caused, it won't happen again"

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

assuming i learned, lol :D

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

Ugh, i thought this was a question, not a link. So i spent time googling for a good tutorial on floats (because I didn't click the link)....

Now i hate myself, and this post.

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago

welp, i did your style too man

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 28 points 3 months ago

Executives, focus on executives.

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 56 points 8 months ago

As a parent, this is a parenting/personal issue, fuck off and please spend my money doing useful things (like supporting health care, or housing) not attempting to protect my children.

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 24 points 11 months ago

Giving someone a bad review is stating ng your opinion, telling others to do the same is more of the same, just like you've done here.

The reason for crunch is oversupply of employees who want to work in the industry or product. This doesn't happen where employees value their time, or there is a undersupply of talent.

Games are not cheap when compared to other entertainment, and they involve the same magnitude of costs, these are businesses and crunch is exploiting talent.

There is a bad actor here, but it's not the customer.

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 45 points 11 months ago

review bombing them and calling for boycotts because they raised their prices is fucking bullshit.

Just like you've stated your opinion here, they also can and should do that.

I wish every gamer had to work through crunch on at least one game

This is silly, developers shouldn't put up with crunch, but the blame for this doesn't lie with the customers, but instead with the corporation exploiting them.

You seem to be attacking the customer, and commiserating with the employees, but completely ignoring that somewhere all the value of the enterprise is being extracted. All in favour of status quo, this is terrible for everyone who actually works on the game, or pays for the game.

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago

no please no

1

I think i've found a bug, but i'm not sure the protocol for where to submit it.

The bug:

This comment: https://old.lemmy.ca/comment/3118239

For the regular view: https://lemmy.ca/comment/3118239)

  • clicking "show context" shows a sibling comment
  • clicking "View all comments", shows all comments but either my comment or the sibling comment.
  • clicking "1 more reply" returns nothing

I think the parent comment (and replies to my comment have been deleted. Maybe this is intentional behaviour

Actually this might be the bug: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3886

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago

The whole "article"

Canada Post reported a before-tax loss of $254 million for its second quarter. Revenue dropped by $78 million, or six per cent, year-over-year. Canada Post announced a transformation plan in June that targeted the e-commerce market for parcel delivery but ruled out staffing cuts.

Canada post costs money to run, it doesn't lose money, just like our hospitals and schools cost money, they aren't lost we are paying for these things so we have a nice place to live.

It's a small thing, but it's a huge difference of meaning.

If there was anything else at all in the article explaining the increase being unnecessary then maybe...

[-] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago

Working lunch...

Never again

view more: next ›

karlhungus

joined 1 year ago