[-] jzzvid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago

Thats because back then you got a paid lunch and in the 1990s companies stopped offering that and said it was a boon to workers because "you can leave the property for lunch" and other excuses like "liability" and such.

Now workers have to stay an extra hour and dont get paid for that time.

[-] jzzvid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago

If I see a sign in a business whining about workers or people not wanting to work, I will straight up leave and go somewhere else. Tells me everything I need to know about how the owner treats their workers.

[-] jzzvid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 months ago

It's newspeak for "I don't want messages that I disgree with in my media."

Just like when conservatives complain about something being "political" they mean "progressive" and by progressive I mean "they saw a minority."

It's a way of saying something without saying it.

[-] jzzvid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 year ago

Not surprised. Prager U has been gunning for their propaganda becoming official school curricula for years. It was obvious from the start with their bad info-graphics style and the fact they have been pushing their channel on children for years with the help of YouTube's algorithm. Fascists aren't satisfied with keeping their politics to themselves, they want to forcefully indoctrinate your children behind your back in the classroom.

It's time parents push back. Teachers need to strike. Students need to strike. Parents need to demand en-masse that this be removed from the curriculum or they will remove their children from the school. This is unacceptable.

[-] jzzvid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago

Every time I hear the phrase "under oath" I mentally replace it with "pinky promise" because it all has tbe exact same amount of weight. There's no reason to assume someone is being truthful just because they promised you they aren't lying.

Then there is the technicality of "if they believe it is the truth then they aren't lying" so as long as other have convinced them enough for them to believe it, then they haven't broken their oath.

This is just meaningless elementary school behavior from adults and anyone that can't see that or thinks oaths and such symbolic social constructs are meaningful are not worth taking seriously.

[-] jzzvid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 year ago

Only comments on account are defending a pedophile, white supremacist terror organization. Not sus at all.

[-] jzzvid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 year ago

Actually, it is extremely relevant to the story that this person was a member of a terrorist group that is for implementing theocracy, repealing the rights of women and queer folk, and accusing their political enemies pedophilia.

[-] jzzvid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago

Literally this, actually. There is no such crime as "domestic terrorism." It literally does not exist on the books. It's an undefined term that has no statute attached to it.

That's why you see so much stuff where white supremacists get charged with "conspiracy to riot" and such. It's about creating double standards and propaganda through the law.

[-] jzzvid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago

Rothbard is the reason we associate Libertarianism with the Right. He's the one that suggested calling themselves Libertarians and Anarcho-Capitalists. Before him, Libertarianism was a Socialist thing and had little to do with Capitalism.

Basically, modern Libertarians stole the term from the Left to re-brand themselves as something they weren't and to create this guise of pretending to care about people's liberty and freedom—which they also don't because Rothbard supported and advised Fascists and had no problem with slavery or indentured servitude.

The Right loves to steal and re-define terms used on the left.

13
The Original Meme (youtube.com)
submitted 1 year ago by jzzvid@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/memes@lemmy.ml

Who remembers this one?

[-] jzzvid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago

We're just getting started!

[-] jzzvid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago

For the longest time, I avoided Reddit because of just how toxic it was becoming. This is really true of a lot of social networks. That's why I joined this instance (lemmy.blahaj.zone) because it doesn't have a downvote button, allows NSFW content for when I want it, and seems to have a friendly userbase. I was initially on Lemmygrad, but it really felt like an echo chamber and quite frankly I need a detox from "tankie" spaces.

I'm starting to realize the value in curating my spaces and paying attention to what I expose myself too. The last several years have been unbearable. Social media has put gasoline on a civilization that is on fire. It's been terrible for all of our well-being and mental health. And behind all of this are algorithms keeping us addicted and logged-on. What was once fun became an inescapable curse.

The thing is none of us are to blame for all this. Everyone was manipulated into it. But now we know we can at least try to do something about it. Independent and federated networks are part of that solution. Taking the social influence out of the hands of corporations who control what we see and manipulate our emotions so they can harvest and sell our data is key.

In the collapse of major social networks there is a silver lining—we have the ability to change the tide. This is a major opportunity for us and we should us it to make the Internet a better space. We all both need and deserve that.

[-] jzzvid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 year ago

Reddit is going to be a ghost town in a few months at this rate. If they wanted to push the website and app so hard, why not just make using a client a premium feature and charge for it? Give the users the option. Instead they had to go the worst route possible with this.

view more: next ›

jzzvid

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF