3
submitted 3 years ago by jazzfes@lemmy.ml to c/australia@lemmy.ml

"The bill grants the Australian Federal Police and Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission new powers to combat serious crime enabled by anonymising technology using three new warrants: network activity, data disruption and account takeover.

With the warrants, both agencies can take control of a person’s online account to gather evidence about serious offences without consent, as well as add, copy, delete or alter material to disrupt criminal activity and collect intelligence from online networks."

Unbelievable....

[-] jazzfes@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago)

There is a difference between people advocating for human rights abuses and people saying that some actor does in fact not engage in human rights abuses. The difference is stark and even there, if the actor would in fact in engage in human right abuses.

An open society must tolerate the later. I.e. we must tolerate that people dispute that human right abuses occur or occurred. This is because you cannot judge someone purely due to getting the facts wrong or not knowing them.

If we wouldn't allow this, we would de-facto argue for a totalitarian state, since we wouldn't allow people disputing facts (which can be proven or disproven). We would have to nominate some entity that judges what is fact and what isn't, which is the opposite to gathering evidence and engaging in an open, society wide discussion.

To be clear: Allowing discussions around whether abuses occur is notably different to letting people get away with advocating for abuses. The latter is what needs strong responses. The former is what requires engagement.

I don't see anything on lemmy or in the mastodon thread that shows that human rights abuses are advocated for. What I do see is that there are some fractions that show sympathies to China which you would otherwise only see for the USA. I think its useful to compare these sympathies because they seem to express themselves in similar ways.

With all that said, I think the opinion expressed in the mastodon thread is not particularly useful. It, in many ways, minimises real human rights abuses that occur world wide, day to day, in China, USA, and many other countries in East and West.

Let's call out the abuses, let's discuss and present the evidence for them, let's not alienate people and create polarity that looks like us-vs-them.

2
submitted 3 years ago by jazzfes@lemmy.ml to c/freebsd@lemmy.ml

I installed FreeBSD a few days ago. So far the experience is pretty good:

While it starts with a very minimal system, it's relatively easy to build it up to something "normal", in my case a KDE desktop.

The biggest change compared to linux I have to get used to is that the documentation seems often to be better than a search on the internet.

Case in point was my 60 minute effort fixing a DNS leak with my VPN:

After spending some time managing the openvpn connection and automating it on startup, I noticed that I'm leaking DNS...

Spent some time searching the net, until I found and followed 30.7.2. DNS Server Configuration in the handbook, which explains how to set the system DNS. After getting the public DNS from my VPN provider, and following the instructions in the manual, the leaks were gone...

I remember having chased DNS leaks in linux for weeks.... Quite happy so far :)

[-] jazzfes@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago

HTPC

I haven't bought a monitor / TV in probably 8 years but was recently thinking about it.... however really disliked that pretty much all TVs today are Smart TVs which actually made me wonder:

When selecting the monitor, what do you need to check when you want one that will work well for sports / soccer?

1
submitted 3 years ago by jazzfes@lemmy.ml to c/freebsd@lemmy.ml

Looking into FreeBSD at the moment and quite like what I read so far. Looked for books and got this...

Thought the opinionated search engine was quite funny :)

Will still install it anyway... :P

jazzfes

joined 3 years ago