[-] ilovesatan@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago

Well now I need a tool that makes graphs like this. I think I smell a winter break project coming up

[-] ilovesatan@lemmy.world 132 points 9 months ago

Too bad they don't sell them in the US. I would buy one immediately.

[-] ilovesatan@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago

The explaination of how differentials work was painfully wrong. An I lost confidence in this author's ability to explain the topic.

[-] ilovesatan@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

Am I the only person who doesn't have WiFi problems?

[-] ilovesatan@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

Fuck this guy but what is with this article. Does rolling stone really think that their readership is so dumb they'd believe this was anything other than an obvious attempt at humor?

[-] ilovesatan@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

I grew up in the rural southern US. I can confirm that women like to hunt. Maybe not as much as the dudes, but enough that I wouldn't call it niche. I could totally see a society which relied on subsistence hunting have a lot of women in hunter role.

[-] ilovesatan@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

Communism's solution to homelessness is mass starvation.

[-] ilovesatan@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

This is FUD. AI integration is a given, but I doubt they would outright axe the start button unless they plan to fundamentally change the Windows UX design language.

If they do, expect it to go the way of Windows 8.0 real fast.

[-] ilovesatan@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

This means nothing. I'd be willing to bet that anyone unwilling to wear a mask is also unwilling to listen to science/medical experts.

[-] ilovesatan@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago

The article misinterprets the results. Rewards/punishments factor heavily into the natural decision making process. We are taking about emergent phenomenon, not predestination.

[-] ilovesatan@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Sounds like something a vampire pedo would say.

[-] ilovesatan@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

May Lemmy never archive old posts.

2
submitted 1 year ago by ilovesatan@lemmy.world to c/adhd@lemmy.world

I realize that this turned into a wall of text. See TLDR.

I made the decision to seek psychiatric care for what I believe to be ADHD. At my new patient appointment, after being drug tested at the door, we discussed my occasional use of marijuana. They made me agree to completely stop consuming weed and in no certain terms said they would drug test me in a month's time to make sure I actually quit.

I understand that there is some concern that marijuana can worsen ADHD. I am not in a position to challenge my care provider on the science of the matter. What I don't understand is why they are taking such overbearing measures to make sure I abstain from marijuana.

For example, when I had a colonoscopy performed a couple of years ago, I was advised by my doctor not to consume any food or liquids within a certain window before the procedure. I simply agreed to fast during that period and that was it. They trusted me to be an adult and follow their instructions. They didn't check for food in my stomach when I arrived at the hospital.

I should note that this practice primarily practices substance abuse treatment. Could this be a side effect of some zero-tolerance policy? Or do they really believe that smoking marijuana is that detrimental to my well-being?

TLDR; Dr asked me to quit smoking weed in order to get access to treatment. And said they would drug test me.

  1. Did your Dr also mention marijuana?
  2. Did they drug test you?
view more: next ›

ilovesatan

joined 1 year ago