So what I take away after a quick skim on xmas eve is... this is an attempt at one app for all (or big parts) of the fediverse?
haverholm
Works for me.
I think this is the most mature and versatile one? Bookwyrm is nice for what it does, but it's only books.
Semantics. If person A is protected by privacy rights in her jurisdiction, but her data is scraped by project B from one where such rights conveniently aren't legally respected, A should still be able to expect some way of injunction.
Correct answer, of course.
Using one LLM to fuck up a lot more is poetic I suppose. I'd just rather not use them in the first place.
I'm trying to optimise my human efficiency vs effort here, but yeah. Get your point.
Theoretically speaking, what level of nonsense are we talking about in order to really mess up the training model?
a) Something that doesn't represent the actual contents of the website (like posting "The Odyssey" to the llms.txt
of a software documentation site),
b) a randomly generated wall of real words out of context, or
c) just straight lorem ipsum filler?
Yeah, terrific use for a mini PC. Will some self hosters and home labbers spit bile at the thought? Probably. It's a matter of personal requirements.
Basically, like you say, most mini PCs are quiet, power efficient, and just carry that bit more oomph than a SBC.
For context, Rock Paper Shotgun is a gaming site, which is why the reviewer focuses so heavily on game performance on different mini PCs. Unsurprisingly, the answer to the title isn't an unequivocal "yes", but some of the little lunch boxes fare quite well despite their limited specs.
A more accurate title would be "Should gamers bother with mini PCs," but given their audience that would be superfluous 🙂 I think mini PC gaming will continue to be a niche interest, but there are certainly other and probably better uses for the tiny computers.
Yeah, the only threat to Big Tech is that they might sink a lot of money into training material they'd have to give away later. But releasing the material into the Public Domain is not exactly an improvement for the people whose data and work has been used without consent or payment.
"Congratulations, your rights are still being violated, but now the data is free to use for everyone".
Probably true. I don't see anything like that in the article, though?