It’s the privacy we want for ourselves, not the privacy for others. It’s a hard argument to make when it’s “70,000 potential rapists” data. I do have an opinion, but I’m not gonna touch this one.
fishabel
joined 5 months ago
“We said don’t get caught, you would be disavowed.”
I don’t know how this is treason, but nothing good is in a “hot dog.”
The expensive stuff only sold in rich neighborhoods.
I think there is a lot of probable cause and events that suggest profoundly that he did not take his own life. For example, he blew the whistle and was not done testifying. He had another round after that and had it scheduled. He wasn’t in for a penny, he put down the pound up front. I can’t think of any reason he would stop half way…
Now, was it an executive decision, or just a stockholder worried about their cash flow. Who knows. But if I was an investor, I’d look at Boeing first. But, we know how it goes. Barnett wasn’t rich, so there was no manhunt.
So much censorship.
Boeing killed John Barnett
OMG they killed the women?! Probably for refusing sex.
The link shows for me. So, nice try. But sure, let’s shut down the upcoming global genocide conversation
The US is about to do this to immigrants
I’ve been getting a lot higher too.
It could also be some misrepresentation of the group. A group of incels, that’s plausible. A small number of prolific users flooding the airwaves with talk of rape could easily make a community appear to be engaging. And how many of those users are real and not just repeats or bots? Clearly some filtering needs to happen. Either way, it’s a lot of people.