fbn

joined 5 months ago
[–] fbn@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 week ago

You are correct.

[–] fbn@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago (6 children)

you're right, i didnt read closely enough, a constitutional amendment is and would have been hot air at any time since the descision.

A law would be something that they might be able to get passed if they actually wanted to pass it, which they dont, because thats how they all got into power.

[–] fbn@slrpnk.net 43 points 1 week ago (11 children)

I agree, but i aint gonna stow it. Why didnt they introduce it when they were able to maybe pass it? Im not going to refrain from criticizing them just because worse people are in power.

[–] fbn@slrpnk.net 108 points 1 week ago (25 children)

would have been more useful when you had any kind of power to get a bill passed, but thanks anyway i guess

[–] fbn@slrpnk.net 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why? I like how lemmy is now, why would we want to bring the people here that can't find their own way?

[–] fbn@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

check my other post, i put it on the innerwebs

 

chinga tu maga

Piture 1: A yard sign with a picture of a former orange president smiling and giving a thumbs up with the words "weird old loser rapist" hand written in red drippy paint over a black background

Picture 2: the reverse side of the sign, a white background with the words "CHINGA TU MAGA" hand written in black and red paint

mods: not sure if this fits here, maybe too close to random pictures, i defer to your judgement and no hard feelings on my part if this post is removed.

update: someone called the police for the obscene language, and im not going to fight the city, so the chinga tu maga side is all black now.

Leave a comment for possible replacement messages, mild language but spicy content preferred

[–] fbn@slrpnk.net 12 points 5 months ago

Who decides that the woman's life is at-risk enough to qualify as necessary? A panel of priests? The election police? A healthcare provider? The person whose life is on the line?

This seems to be the state health agencies clarifying the current rules. Not ideal, but hopefully only temporary until this law becomes unconstitutional.