[-] eupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 3 months ago

Sure, but broadly reducing red meat consumption is a pretty good idea for a lot of reasons. I think you're acknowledging this re: factory beef farms, but I think it's important to call out and also to note that a like 80% plant-based diet can be nutritionally complete, not ridiculously expensive, and more sustainable.

[-] eupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 4 months ago

yeah I heard this album, it's ok but personally I just think CD Laser Lens Cleaner has elevated the genre further

https://rateyourmusic.com/release/album/cd-laser-lens-cleaner/cd-laser-lens-cleaner/

2
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by eupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/thelyricsgame@lemmy.ca

answer: :::Low - Days Like These:::

[-] eupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Generally, using their current preferred name/pronouns (or neutral pronouns) is best. She's still the same person, so it's true to say Caitlyn Jenner won the 1976 Olympic Decathlon. If any other facts about the event itself were directly relevant to the conversation, that'd be ok - e.g. it would be accurate and inoffensive imo to say she won the men's division.

But name/pronouns change all the time otherwise so it's more normal to use the current ones. If Ms. Jones gets married and is now Mrs. Smith, it wouldn't be inaccurate to talk about Mrs. Smith's car breaking down last summer.

[-] eupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

that's definitely part of it, but sex hormones interact with* neurotransmitters and the mental/emotional stuff tends to hit first, before any physical effects take place.

178
Return to PAINT rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
[-] eupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I fight people and have opinions!

Really depends on the sport. In non-professional fencing and HEMA, practice tends to be coed. Men and women tend to perform equivalently - really height is the biggest "biological advantage". More reach means more ability to hit an opponent before they hit you, and this goes the same for men and women. Sure, men can accelerate a bit faster and tend to be taller, women can plant their feet a little wider and tend to be more balanced and flexible - but these are just averages. Individual people vary wildly because biology doesn't give a shit about the categories we create to describe it. And strategy can make up for a lot of those things in ways that you really just can't with height discrepancies. We had to give our club's tallest member a shorter axe just to make up for the reach advantage when she fought people she stood a head above.

Dividing strictly based on AGAB is not an even playing field and I feel trans athletes only draw attention to what's already a significant problem in competitive sports. And once you get to a professional level, I understand there's more nuance, but a vast, vast majority of athletes are not professional and the issue is blown far out of proportion for them. Anyone pushing to enforce divisions in kids' sports via genital inspections has lost their goddamn minds.

[-] eupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 8 months ago

SPD has "limited value" to the small biased sample of locals I know. They're very unpopular in some communities, especially queer/minority communities around where these inspections took place. But as always, many others aren't directly impacted and so they tend to be quietly neutral or supportive of the police.

[-] eupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Outer Wilds, to my estranged family. I think they could use a new religion and that game's probably a better place to start.

[-] eupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 year ago

different flavors of weird for sure. Depends on which type you're more comfortable around.

[-] eupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 1 year ago

me n the trans catgirl polycule reading lambda calculus whitepapers like :3

[-] eupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 year ago

She'll probably be a regular 42 year old woman?

[-] eupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

On top of what the others have said: at 11 years old, a trans kid is very unlikely to be medically transitioning, and so their transition is entirely social. With that in mind, what is the actual harm to a kid socially exploring trans identity and then later changing their mind? Why would that percentage need to be 100%?

[-] eupraxia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 year ago

Sure, why not?

view more: next ›

eupraxia

joined 1 year ago