crashfrog

What part of war isn’t bad?

Must be sharing the feelings of average Germans at the end of the war when they had to face up to what they had allowed to go on.

The ones who hadn’t died in the war, you mean. Or do you also think “German” is a word that can’t mean “soldier”?

Famine is present in some areas of Gaza and is imminent in other areas. As UN Secretary-General António Guterres warned more than two months ago, “1.1 million people in Gaza are facing catastrophic hunger

What does this statement mean? It certainly can’t mean 1.1 million people have been unable to acquire food and eat it, because they have and have continued to.

This occurred through the imposition of a total siege over Gaza that involved completely closing the three border crossing points, Rafah, Kerem Shalom and Erez, from 8 October 2023 for extended periods

It is not a crime of war to besiege an enemy city, nor to deny an enemy people access to a nation they wish to attack.

What’s the source for your claim that 52,000 civilians died in Gaza?

Doing what? Fighting a war they didn’t start?

Too late, he already admitted I was right

The Hamas-led attacks in southern Israel on October 7 killed at least 1,200 Israelis and foreign nationals

Literally from your article. Did you read it?

No ethnographic studies have shown that any present or past society has used barter without any other medium of exchange or measurement, and anthropologists have found no evidence that money emerged from barter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barter

What would be an example of the barter economy you’re certain exists? How do they overcome the need for double coincidence?

There is a large difference between war and genocide.

But that’s what I’m asking you. Can one side achieve overwhelming victory, in your view, without you calling it a “genocide”?

No, right?