cannedtuna

joined 1 year ago
[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Truly is one of the most versatile tools to own.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 18 points 19 hours ago

Right there with you

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago

You know damn well Republicans weren’t protesting, they tried to take the capitol and tried to kill politicians including Pence.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Ah yes, I feel I can no longer peacefully protest so I think I’ll just standby and do nothing so a guy who thinks protesters should be shot or deported can take the reins. That’ll show ‘em!

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

“I got tired of the system so I decided to let it burn down and take the lives of millions with it”

See Ukraine

See Gaza

See promises of mass deportation

But yes, you’re justified in your non participation because you didn’t actively vote for him, you just enabled his people to hand the control to a madman because you got tired of trying.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Sadly it wasn’t exactly wholly undemocratic. It wasn’t even what you could call close. There were attempts voter suppression and intimidation, but in the end voter apathy won out. I don’t think there’s anything dumber than choosing not to vote in such an important election, but that choice in itself was a vote.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I feel like the quote has gone over your head just a tad. The joke/quote is saying as time progresses people will continue to vote against their own best interest and eventually elect someone as moronic as the common people. And well here we are. It’s been a long time in coming yes, we’ve gone through a number of presidents who progressively did less and less in the interests of the people till we got here and elected the absolute worst person with only self interest at heart.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Implies? It’s not exactly very subtle about it. The joke is how unfortunately prophetic it is.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don’t know what to tell you dude. A certified or digitally can’t/wont be read by OCR. A digitally signed document legally certifies that the document has not been modified. PDF editors such as Bluebeam or Adobe will not or cannot process a certified or digitally signed document.

I’m not sure if that limitation is due to the process by which the document is certified or if it is a feature of software conforming for legality reasons. I’m not going to research this for OP, I’m just providing a simple and best accurate answer.

Maybe current AI has better abilities to process document text? I’m not sure, maybe. But you’d think this would be a shared concern with groups wanting to protect documents for the same reason and therefore encryption would match.

If it’s just the legality of it stopping a company from providing the feature, you would think most companies would want to keep out of legal hot water and would then disallow OCR processing. In this case sure there could be software that doesn’t conform, but for most application purposes I don’t think you’d have to worry too much.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (6 children)

OCR cannot scan documents that have been certified or digitally signed.

Note that once you certify a document it can no longer be edited, combined with another PDF, or have pages inserted or extracted.

Once a PDF has been digitally signed it is locked and you can no longer add pages, delete pages, or read it via OCR.

 
 
 
view more: next ›