That’s not quite right.
If you buy something for 300m, with 200m in loans, and sell it for 250m, you pay the loan back first, and have 50m in losses. Your taxes go down.
He only pays tax on gains.
Remember the whole case is him inflating property value to get loans. Between the fire sale, and the bad loans, it’s very likely he has little to no equity. He could sell all he has and not have any money to pay the $500m (plus interest.) Which also means little to no tax burden.
Can’t you hash it before uploading and upload just the hash? Or download the banned hash list locally.
It’s a good thing they don’t have high resolution cameras tracking everything you look at, or they might know what you were thinking about buying
Cuz it can fall apart if moved or slid. Needs to be redone when picked up.
I’m not saying it was ethical or good.
I’m asking how it specifically impacts privacy.
Every response I’ve gotten is a non privacy response, which leads me to suspect it’s a stealing from others issue not a privacy issue.
Sure but that sounds like liberty and autonomy, not privacy.
I asked specifically how it infringes on privacy. Seems like the wrong word to use.
Look closer. It went from 255g to 200g.
In this case you are wrong. This article is by Forbes Staff, not a contributor.
Forbes uses one name to deliver two different products, one of which is an in house magazine.
Leminity
Laminity
Liminity
Limity
He was on trial for taking loans on fake gains.