the Democrats would rather let the other banch of the uniparty win than support Palestine
You get me $10B annually or so, and then we can start to talk. Your single-fiber line and homelab will handle, what, 25 simultaneous users? Just have to scale that to a billion daily users or so, no bigger.
p2p could do this
Sartre was describing the modern 'troll'
Thank you for the answer.
I rarely use 'seldom'
Thanks for asking, Fed!
It's Cinemark 17, 2900 Gateway St., Springfield, OR, 97477
Just 614 m from my house!
There was always an anti-democratic strain in the political thought of the USA.
It was founded to restrain/limit democracy with strongly centralised executive institutions.
It was that way from the start, by design.
That's not a unique quote either, it's typical of the Founders' thoughts.
Equivocating Stalin and Hitler is some crypto Nazi shit.
It is standard in Westoid discourse, e.g. the Wikipedia page on "authoritarianism" probably does it idk didn't read it.
People who use words like "authoritarianism" equate the two.
Hungary was also the best part of the Soviet Bloc to live in for the people.
So it's not just that modern Hungary is worse: communist Hungary is more miss-able than communist East Germany.
Nigel Swain's two books on the subject are good:
-
Collective Farms Which Work? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)
-
Hungary: The Rise and Fall of Feasible Socialism (London: New Left Books, 1992)
He's writing from the perspective of a non-red English academic who's like.... "wait... this works?? how do we explain the anomaly?"
Hungary had full shelves, booming agriculture, available consumer goods.
Or the CIA made it all up because Mao and Stalin et al did nothing wrong. ๐
They made mistakes. But overall their countries were a gazillion times better from their influence.
that ignores the question