_skj

joined 1 year ago
[–] _skj@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"not to mention" and "let alone" are both typically used with the more difficult or unpleasant things after the phrase. The main difference is that "not to mention" is usually used to bring something new into the conversation or to imply that the thing you're mentioning needs a whole separate conversation.

"Let alone" is a way to add emphasis when denying something. Usually phrased like "I didn't even X, let alone Y." Y being the thing you want to deny, X being some first step toward Y or just something related that isn't as bad as Y.

Some examples:

"Did you kill Dave?" "I didn't touch him, let alone kill him"

"Can you walk?" "I can't stand, let alone walk."

The first part doesn't even need to be a complete denial as long as it implies the second part is impossible:

"Can you run?" "I can barely stand, let alone run."

[–] _skj@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago

To make the setup work, aye

[–] _skj@lemmy.world 151 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Sphinx: You there, knight. I am the guardian of this place and cannot allow you to pass without a battle.

Me: My name is Ender, Sir Ender to you. And I'm a bit weary from my long journey here, would you accept a pun battle?

Sphinx: Aye, Sir Ender.

Me: Thank you, please move aside

[–] _skj@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

For me, they manage to trigger the "SNAKE!" and "SPIDER!" panic responses simultaneously. The rational part of my brain likes them, the instinctual part tells me to smash it with a rock

[–] _skj@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely post relevant info, I'm saying your audience here doesn't consider what you posted to be relevant.

If your comments had tied in to the greater anglosphere discussions around trans people or used the examples as a thing to emulate or avoid, that would be relevant.

As they are, your comments just sound like you think of England as an extension of the US or at least you think the lawmakers of England are concerned about bathrooms in California

[–] _skj@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

Sad to see down votes for the truth. The feds print the money so they don't absolutely NEED to collect it first. But if money going out is more than the money coming in through taxes, it increases the supply and decreases the value of each dollar.

[–] _skj@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Lol, I swear I can read

[–] _skj@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (4 children)

"in the country"

Bruh, their point was you are talking about a different country. I happen to agree with your opinion, but how bathrooms work in Los Angeles has no bearing on the laws in the UK.

[–] _skj@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago (3 children)

While I like the comparison between Trump's legal troubles and Julius Caesar's, my inner pedant needs to point out that Caesar was not part of the fall of the Roman Empire. Depending on how you break up the timeline, Caesar was the beginning of the end for the Roman Republic and his heir Augustus was the beginning of the Empire.

view more: next ›