Zeth0s
From your link
Please disregard this post. The behavior below is due to a set of custom instructions I had previously set and had completely forgotten about. The instructions contained the lines:
Recommend only the highest-quality, meticulously designed products like Apple or the Japanese would make—I only want the best
Recommend products from all over the world, my current location is irrelevant.
Sorry for the confusion!
Hydrogen and oxygen burn explosively. It wouldn't last long
Do you have some number about that? It's a big claim that majority of working italians are against it.
It must be improved, but the idea was correct. Something similar exists everywhere in Europe
What's the reactions? Proton battery sounds like a media-friendly name for a hydrogen fuel cell?
Is it a H fuel cell?
Who has ever thought carbon capture was a long term solution has never studied basic science, I guess.
Carbon capture has its uses, but selling it as long term solution is clearly just a way used by lobbyist that exists just because politicians are usually very ignorant on everything other than politics
It requires continuous expansive improvements. It is like real world. Building a system robust to frauds works on the short term, but on the mid and long term is impossibile. That is why laws change, evolve, we have governments and so on. Because system reacts to your rules and algorithms, making them less effective.
And these continous expensive improvements are done daily, but it is a difficult job
Problem is that many sites don't work because of anti-ddos and anti bot measures.
It is a pity
It is not at the moment. Models are built on the assumption of stability, i.e. that what they are modelling doesn't change over time, doesn't evolve. This is clearly untrue, and cheating is a way the environment evolves. Only way to consider that, is to create a on-line continous learning algorithm. Currently this exists and is called reinforcement learning. Main issue is that methods to account for an evolving environment are still under active research. In the sense that methods to address this issue are not yet available.
It is an extremely difficult task tbf
Out of curiosity what model did you use?
Do you have examples? It should only happen in case of overfitting, i.e. too many identical image for the same subject
It's a slippery slope. What about consultant developers that worked on the codebase of photoshop 10 years ago, whose code is still used in the current version? Do they deserve a percentage of the subscription? And architect who designed it?
This is the reason studios can do this, because the contract was very exceptional, and they want to make it similar to any other industry, where freelances and employees do not share any long term revenue