ValueSubtracted

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF

Haha it was clear, just having some fun.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 3 points 8 months ago (4 children)

tim hortons kind of hypocrites; may mirror society

Well they're apparently also a source of cheap, exploitable labour, so that's...something.

Probably. I have no particular horse in this race, and rarely buy fast food coffee.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The quality isn't great, but it's hard to find better prices, which is enough for most people, I think.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 36 points 8 months ago (10 children)

I think the headline misrepresents it a bit, but:

  • Tim's has a long history of playing to a sense of nostalgia and "shared Canadian values".

  • Politicians have been using this association to try to seem like Regular Joes for years.

  • The franchise is owned by one of the largest corporations in the world.

  • Their menu increasingly contradicts the "traditional" vibe they promote, with newer items like Sweet Chili Chicken Loaded Wraps and Loaded Bowls, Tiramisu Cold Brew, and Blackberry Yuzu Sparkling Quenchers.

  • They're also increasingly expanding options that discourage people from eating in-store, eroding their "de facto town square" image.

  • Maybe the confused identity of the brand reflects the confused identity of Canada as a whole.

To be honest, it's a pretty muddled piece, but there are a couple of interesting points in there.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

"Instead of really trying to bring in the best and the brightest to fill the labour market gaps that need to be filled, what we're doing is bringing in low skill, low wage, expendable and exploitable temporary foreign workers in the form of students," Banerjee said in an interview.

Refreshingly blunt. Also unsurprising. Also yikes.

Starfleet Academy (if that’s still a thing?)

Definitely still a thing, reportedly say to start filming later this summer.

As for S31, I don't know if you keep up with the news, but...

spoilerone of the characters is reportedly a young Rachel Garrett, which is fairly suggestive of the movie's setting.

They have gone out of their way to portray L'ak as a doofus (and writer Carlos Cisco even gave an interview where he suggested that Breen are dumber in their fleshy form), so you may be right.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (8 children)

Okay, I was certain for a quite a while that L'ak's death was a fakeout...up to a certain point. L'ak said Moll wasn't going to like his plan, which made me think that dying, or appearing to die, was part of it.

But...that was before a Breen medic showed up to help - they should be a lot harder to fool than Culber, who has only a rudimentary understanding of Breen physiology. And the episode certainly framed it as real. And they've dangled a possible motivation for Moll, in a desire to use the Progenitor technology to revive him.

And yet something still screams "bluff" to me. Thoughts?

Edit: also...SEVEN OF LIMES

 

LoglineWith Moll and L’ak finally in custody, the Federation is pulled into a diplomatic and ethical firestorm when the Breen arrive and demand they be handed over. Meanwhile, a frustrated Book looks for ways to help as Tilly, Adira, and Reno work to decipher the latest clue.


Written by: M. Raven Metzner

Directed by: Jon Dudkowski

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 55 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Let's be honest: at this point, they could make the greatest Star Trek film of all time, and it would only be 1/47 as entertaining as watching the executives at Paramount Pictures stepping on infinite rakes in infinite combinations as they try to make the damn thing.

view more: ‹ prev next ›