TheBuenasTardes

joined 1 year ago
[–] TheBuenasTardes@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

What also doesn’t make sense is, if you roughly line up his arm position in the three NYT stills vs going frame by frame in the video/audio playback captured by the various news outlets, he raises his hand to his ear nearly 2/3rds a second after the audio recorded first shot, which, given bullet velocity and distance traveled was probably nearly a full second after the first shot (so a super slow reaction time, which normal nervous system reaction time is .150-.300/sec), since you’ll hear (and audio record) the shot roughly 5 frames after it’s passed by. He starts to lift his hand off the podium at nearly the same time the second shot estimates to be fired, and maybe 3-4 frames before the first posted NYT pic catches the bullet supposedly whizzing by.

[–] TheBuenasTardes@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Someone posted the code for circadian whole home lighting, running on a pi not too long ago. Might be kinda cool to try out.

[–] TheBuenasTardes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Any Brother color laser. Total workhorse for cheap.

[–] TheBuenasTardes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Just had this discussion with an attorney friend actually. As a corporation, it is reduction of risk. Spend time on a jury in a criminal case and you’ll see how variable the verdict-making process really is, sadly. Most attorneys will force the hand of corporations to settle — guaranteed small/ medium payout, or a roll the dice chance at having to make a massive payout — they’ll always go the settle route.