Supernova1051

joined 2 years ago
[–] Supernova1051@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

did they comment (maybe I missed it) on why they're ending development?

the rich always get a fast pass

they think because he inherited a recovering economy, that he himself had some major part in it.

~~as usual, devs are lost in implementing ludicrously complex scenarios for threat models that touch but a percentile of users, instead of implementing functionality that’s normal everywhere else.~~

as usual, users are lost in complaining about a privacy-centered application prioritizing on privacy-centered solutions, instead of using the hundreds of other already insecure applications that are normal everywhere else.

people really will complain about anything. It's like progress means nothing, unless a fully working solution is available day 1, it's completely worthless. bff

What is the use case for it?

The same use case as any crypto - to use as currency and pay debts.

Seems kind of pointless and a lot more tedious than just a bank transfer.

The same can be said of every crypto which doesn't hit any kind of adoption.

Why does signal include crypto nonsense in their app (I like crypto, but just can’t see any reason why it should be integrated in the app)

It aligns with Signal's mission statement to "Protect free expression and enable secure global communication through open source privacy technology." [1]. The reason it was integrated into the app was to support crypto that was "easy to use". The same way cash provides privacy by not allowing third parties to see what you're doing, they believe(d) that enabling a privacy preserving crypto wallet would further "protect free expression".

I’m sad that signal does not have support for 3rd party open source clients that could remove such features.

It's not not enabled by default and makes up for (based on github commits and pulling a random number out of my ass based on my continue following of Signal's development) less than 1% of development work since it was introduced.

Why not add support for monero instead?

Monero did not meet the technical requirements that the Signal developers were looking for at the time. Signal has commented that they would consider adding other crypto, as long as it meets the technical requirements - which I don't have so can't source unfortunately.

[1] https://signalfoundation.org/en/

[–] Supernova1051@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago

Actually yes. They want to privatize it so that they can make money on it. Failure is the goal.

Actually yes. They want to privatize it so that they can ~~make money on it~~ further exploit the working class. Failure is the goal.

Although you're right, I like to call out what it will do to everyone so it's more explicit and will hopefully click in people's minds.

[–] Supernova1051@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago

Trump's is Putin's puppet. He's set to destroy whatever he can.

I've found sh.itjust.works to be pretty decent so far.

[–] Supernova1051@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

its more about what he represents

Happens more than we'd like to believe. The mans dad wasn't actually even dead in the case linked below. The policy will continue to make these mistakes until the consequences of their failures comes directly out of their pay.

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2024-06-01/fontana-police-coerced-false-murder-confession-with-lies

Money could maybe provide more resources to care for people, but the core issue here is that adults who were foster children lack the support of a family - which no amount of money can fix.

billions in dollars taken from billionaires to help them for a few more years would absolutely help. maybe not all of them, but any that it does help would be well worth it. billionaires don't need more than one yacht.

view more: next ›