SandbagTiara2816

joined 1 year ago
 
 
 
[–] SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wish I had understood the freedom I really had back then, and used it better

Lots of reasons to dislike Google. That is not one of them.

I think I also had to do some secured email thing to send/get my university transcripts. Like they would send the grad schools I applied to a direct link over secured email, to prevent students from forging or editing them before sending them to grad schools

[–] SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Then I’ll pass and stick with Firefox. Seems like they’re trying to capitalize on some people’s current frustration with Mozilla and their Mastodon instance

[–] SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago (16 children)

I’m a long time fan and user of Firefox. I’ve heard of, but never used, Vivaldi. How does it compare?

[–] SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think the far left (if they're going to vote) aren't likely to be pushed away by more moderation from Harris. They're already far more politically engaged than the vast majority of people. Meanwhile, there are a lot of apolitical people who dislike Trump, but just don't want to vote and feel like they don't know enough about Kamala to feel comfortable voting for her (my Catholic Republican mother, for example). I think that group probably has more people in it than the far left does, and more exposure to Kamala's normalcy relative to Trump is a good thing for swaying them, given the shift in the polls following the last debate. I'll always be disappointed when the Dems pivot right instead of left, but I think the logic is sound in this case.

That is not accurate, and doomerism only helps those who want us too demoralized to put up a fight. If you want to be part of the solution to climate change, I recommend doing some reading on what the range of projections and outcomes actually look like.

[–] SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is it fair? Probably, yeah. But I don’t think it’s an effective way of framing or addressing the problem.

The challenge is always getting enough people to do enough of an action that it makes an impact. It is certainly more effective, in terms of reducing emissions, to target policy interventions at leverage points - like forcing energy companies to adopt renewables by law and banning further fossil fuel extraction.

Personal action can be useful to live in alignment with your values and to provide examples to others for ways to get involved in the climate movement, but we can’t consume our way out of this.

I do a lot of data analysis and visualization in my job, and you are correct. I use Excel when I need to share data with co-workers, but I prefer to use Python for just about everything else. I see no reason to embed Python in Excel.

[–] SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, and that should be changed, imo

[–] SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Billionaire wants a totalitarian state, who’s surprised?

No, I just never feel good after using it

 
 
 
 
 
 

“The move makes it all but impossible for a new administration to claw back $27 billion intended for carbon-cutting projects.”

 
 
 
view more: next ›