I think you misunderstood my post. I am quite proficient with C#. I just think other languages do it better.
AOT is not where it should be yet, because not all libraries have full stripping support.
PlusMinus
joined 1 year ago
Nah, C# suffers from a lot of the same shit Java does. Needing everything to be a class is just no longer a good design choice (if it ever was). AOT support is still lacking. I don't get, why it does not have typdefs. I think the solution / project structure is unnecessary and I could probably think of more stuff I dislike about C#. But imho, it still beats Java.
Golang is my choice over C# any time. I strongly prefer how interfaces are handled and I actually like the error handling.
Maybe you should add OTLP support? I don't know how you are ingesting from Fluentbit at the moment, but I think with OTLP basically any log source can be integrated either through the fluentbit OTLP plugin or an OTEL collector.
I hated it, when I went to the club and it sounded like radio.
I just rode nine weeks across the Alps with my SRAM X0 Transmission and the battery lasted the whole trip. A spare doesn't way too much though. A rock hit my transmission hard and it needed slight adjustment. I took less than a second and I did not have to get of my bike. Also, installing the transmission was super easy. All in all, I think it is way more convenient than mechanical shifting, if you are willing to pay the price. It's probably not worth it for most people.
I second this, it is easy to set up Traefik as a reverse proxy with automatic certificate renewal.
What? SMS is a proven standard that works reliably. Why do we need to replace that? I tried RCS twice, in both cases the other end did not receive my message or at a later time. Even if SMS needed replacement, RCS is not it.
There are IDEs for Linux as well and IMO it is unfair to compare IDE vs non-IDE workflows without also looking at the advantage in terms of automation, flexibility and the sheer endlessnes of customization options (e.g. through NeoVIM or Emacs).
You do not have to switch to Linux to get a hang of your Linux development though. Download a 30 day trial of CLion and develop a simple application that can be run in a Linux based container.
Regarding CMake, modern CMake not half as bad. CMake is also cross platform, you actually use it to generate your build files, your target could even be Visual Studio. For Linux it will most likely be a Makefile that you will then use to compile (with GCC or Clang) your code to objects which it will then link to create the binary.
There are also alternatives to CMake, namely Bazel and Meson, but I haven't used them yet.
Once you get the hang of it, you will have a deeper understanding of the language and that will help you in the long run.
CMake will also allow you to use Conan, that makes dependency management even easier.
Electric Callboy are very silly and produce excellent videos.
JBO, if you understand German.
Do you use fractional scaling? Because it is sharp on my machine on sway.
view more: next ›
No sorry, but try literally any other language ;-)