Doesn't look AI generated, but does look Photoshopped. The pattern continues across the body in a way that looks like it's been overlaid in post rather than painted on.
Pretty sure that's her old account, new one is u/xyzaly (also goes by both zipos and zipoz on OF if that's your thing)
This is definitely AI generated, but how does the main text look so good?
I had no idea they were so expensive! This is rather eye-opening, and it definitely gives new perspective to some of the points I made. Thank you for the insight.
I can see how you might reach that conclusion, but consider this: do you feel it is correct to bring a life into the world knowing that you can't afford to provide for them? To me, that's placing an unnecessary burden on both your family and society.
Though with that being said, someone else mentioned that reversals are ~$10,000, which is obscenely expensive and way more than I thought it would be, so the current cost of them does make it seem like I'm saying "only the rich should have children", even when I'm not.
Doesn't work on mobile :(
This is the first time I've ever seen positive sentiment for Google+ online.
I come from early YouTube where it was forced upon us from above, so I'm genuinely curious as to what positives you see in it.
An evening with my what? /s
It can't be that it's defederated because I was using an account local to that instance. Plus, loading the community on a browser works fine.
This, plus the ability to open the main post and scroll sideways to view images in the post (as if they were galleries). That would be fantastic!
Despite these communities existing, Boost doesn't load them directly. I can still see posts from them in Local view, but viewing the community directly doesn't work. This happens on multiple different instances.
The (SFW) community in the image is: !announcements@burggit.moe
burggit.moe/c/announcements
(I'm not sure which link style works, so I'm including both)
I went full Firefox a few weeks ago. It's been mostly fine but there are a few weird hitches that Chromium-based browsers just don't have. So because of that I currently think Brave is a good recommendation for most people.
Kenzie Reeves