[-] Isycius@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

I would also wager that Valve was worried about Microsoft attempting to use "creative" methods to compete with Steam and chipping away at them, like hidden API. Its not like Valve knew that Microsoft's attempt would continue to flop so hard for decades that they couldn't even try that.

[-] Isycius@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago

Disadvantage of said system for Google would be the fact that if you do that, people can skip ads much faster and they won't be able to do any tracking of interaction at all. For advertiser's point of view, that would be just worse version of TV commercial.

[-] Isycius@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago

For many memory intensive operation, this is incorrect since by that logic, Apple's chip should use far more memory due to having quarter as many registers for those purpose. (32x64 vs. 32x256)

Most processors have cache memories for reasons you stated.

[-] Isycius@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago

COBOL case is bit different. You can't just modernize millions of lines of code that is functionally unique without service disruption - and services that uses COBOL that large often tends to be very sensitive.

The fact that COBOL as a language is both atrocity to either use or read didn't help that either.

[-] Isycius@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago

If so, they should pay for Q/A and/or focus testing themselves. Not freeload off from forcing users.

I can already see that this won't gather them any data that is actually useful for analysis.

[-] Isycius@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago

Well, I'm okay with old concept of ads. But it was them that decided that ads must double dip with customer information and it was them that decided that ads viewed by people who are engaged to the ads doesn't count as ads that was 'seen'.

Continuous race to the bottom since then.

[-] Isycius@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

Even assuming that what he claim is true and can back with evidence, he would need to go further and show that loss of productivity caused by remote working is massive enough to: offset cost of borrowing commercial real estate (Or much larger real estate with corresponding maintenance bill in case on-site location is need for other reason), paying employee transportation, giving up remote talent, etc.

It is entirely his fault for not preparing for the time where people will actually bring out calculator when there was moon-sized sign post for several years.

[-] Isycius@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

Personally, I think that is down to most scientists actually facing the reality. Previous expectation was that humanity will be able to adapt to some degree of changes with some sacrifice - then 2020~2021 demonstrated that assumption to be false.

[-] Isycius@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago

Well, to be fair, what they meant to say is "There is no way to prevent this while not changing gun law, state of mental healthcare, income inequality in economic classes, or criminal law and policing issues." which is correct statement overall.

[-] Isycius@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

To be fair, I think this one can be credited to OPEC.

[-] Isycius@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

I do want to point out that no one is actually complaining about price of just building per say. Trailer is fine and all, but does that 20k cover land and basic utilities like water and heating/cooling (Is it well insulated?) in reasonable price and effort? Is Trailer Park actually located close enough to jobs (I don't remember gas and time being free) and it is secure from natural disaster?

That aside, NIMBY mindset is generally dumb stance when everyone is taking it. So there's that.

[-] Isycius@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Considering Samsung during their cost cutting days designed Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 without drawback just fine, I think everyone will be able to do it without drawback just fine as well.

view more: next ›

Isycius

joined 1 year ago