CarloDaTeti

joined 1 year ago
[–] CarloDaTeti@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love to wear dresses! Unfortunately the social stigma is still strong, even in progressive environments. I’d love to see a world where dressing is not a gendered matter.

[–] CarloDaTeti@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Literally though. Nothing good or remotely healthy to eat under 4. I could have gotten a bottle of water but I opted for some crosswords (still had to give 2€ but at least discounted )

[–] CarloDaTeti@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For the record, I have been given a 4€ coupon to use in the duty free.

[–] CarloDaTeti@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Currently waiting a two hours delayed WizzAir flight and I was literally wondering whether I’d have a right to compensation.

[–] CarloDaTeti@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Posts like this are useful as you can easily find trolls and bots to instantly block.

[–] CarloDaTeti@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You make a valid point about the importance of being cautious while sharing information online. It's true that adopting a mindset of not revealing personal identifying details can add an extra layer of privacy and security.

However, it's essential to recognize that not everyone may fully understand the implications of their online actions. Some individuals might be more tech-savvy and privacy-conscious, while others may be less aware of the risks involved.

As technology continues to evolve, so does our understanding of digital privacy. Striking a balance between responsible sharing and safeguarding personal information is crucial. Empowering users with knowledge and tools to make informed decisions about their online presence can contribute to a more privacy-aware and secure online community.

[–] CarloDaTeti@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Indeed, the Fediverse operates on the premise of public visibility, allowing users to share their thoughts and content with a broad audience. It's more about publicity than privacy.

However, the concerns about privacy in the Fediverse arise not from the act of sharing content itself, but rather from the potential risks associated with sharing personal information unintentionally or without proper consent. While people are aware that their posts are public, there can still be instances where sensitive data is inadvertently exposed, leading to unintended consequences.

Moreover, the issue isn't limited to the immediate act of posting but extends to the longevity and persistence of data. Information shared on the Fediverse may persist on various servers, and as you pointed out, circumstances or perspectives might change over time. Ensuring that users have control over their data, even after many years, is a crucial aspect of privacy protection.

The intent is not to stifle free expression or prevent people from sharing their thoughts openly. Rather, it's about empowering users to maintain control over their data and make informed decisions about what they share, with whom, and for how long. Striking a balance between publicity and privacy is essential in fostering a healthy and respectful online environment.

[–] CarloDaTeti@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You make a valid point about the risks associated with trusting central authorities, especially considering the history of security issues with some corporate social media platforms. I agree that the decentralized nature of the Fediverse can offer more control and transparency, allowing users to set up servers and know where their data is stored.

While the internet itself may not be inherently private, it's essential to recognize that users' expectations for privacy and security have evolved over time. People have become more aware of the potential risks and are rightly concerned about their data being mishandled.

Aspirations for greater privacy, security, and anonymity in the Fediverse are important I believe. By emphasizing these aspects and encouraging best practices, we can collectively work towards a safer and more privacy-respecting online environment. The absence of a central authority doesn't guarantee perfect security, but it does provide an opportunity to rethink data ownership and control.

[–] CarloDaTeti@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

While it's true that achieving complete privacy on the internet can be difficult, discussions around privacy in the Fediverse serve as a reminder that users value their data protection. Interestingly, many people express concerns about privacy issues in mainstream apps like Instagram, or the new Threads app, yet they might overlook similar concerns on the Fediverse. It's essential for users to be consistent in their expectations of privacy, regardless of the platform they use.

[–] CarloDaTeti@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

While it's true that the Fediverse is primarily a platform for sharing thoughts and content publicly, privacy concerns arise when users might inadvertently share sensitive information or when data gets accessed without their consent. I believe striking the right balance between sharing publicly and safeguarding privacy is crucial. Users should be aware of the privacy settings and be cautious about the information they share, even in a public space, to ensure a safer and more secure experience on the Fediverse.

[–] CarloDaTeti@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

According to the author, the fediverse is not a place for sensitive or private information. Users should be cautious about what they post, as the lack of central enforcement or authority makes it difficult to ensure privacy across the network. Requests for post deletion may not be honored, and server owners in different jurisdictions might not adhere to data privacy rules. Instances could also not be immune to data scraping from big companies. Ultimately, the fediverse lacks the necessary privacy measures, making it a privacy nightmare.

What are your thoughts on this? Can the fediverse be constructed as a privacy stronghold for its users?

view more: next ›