BussyCat

joined 2 months ago
[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The navies of the world love nuclear power, the U.S. has a nuclear navy since the 50s and in that time our investment into civilian nuclear has been pathetic

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Where in the U.S. is 7.25 even a remotely livable wage? The U.S. government already has locality calculations for different municipalities that wouldn’t be hard to do with a minimum wage where high cost areas would have a higher minimum wage and low cost areas would have a lower one

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I agree anyone working a full time job should be able to afford a one bedroom apartment but minimum wage in 1940 was $624a year and an average apartment seemed to be $324 a year so to meet that same level of pay we would “only” need a minimum wage of 17.25. That’s still way more than the current minimum wage of 7.25 but not as high as $25/hr

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I couldn’t tell from reading the article but are all phones required to have Bluetooth now? Like is the end of dumb phones?

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

More people die from wind turbines and hydro than from nuclear on a per tWh basis. If we actually want to save lives we would require higher levels of safety standards on fossil fuels that are magnitudes more dangerous than nuclear

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Second time in 179 years sounds a lot more impressive than they endorsed the same party they did during the last election. They broke the seal in 2020 and will probably endorse someone again in 2028

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That means the term “war crimes” is meaningless because it would just mean war. The point of specifying some actions as war crimes is to denote things that even in war you shouldn’t do not just say that all wars are crimes

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

That would make every crime a war crime going back thousands of years where they would lay siege on villages until the citizens starved

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

There is approximately 15.77B acres of livable land and there are 8.2B people so if each person had just 1/4 acre that would be 13% vs if you gave each person 2000 sqft it would only be 2%. Then you need to factor in how to built transit for low density and how many more stores you need due to the lower density and you can see that it would be much better for the environment if we had higher density

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

That’s why I put it in quotes sinces it’s all bullshit but it’s how’s they draw the line

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You get “compensated for you time” not paid so with whole blood it usually only takes 10 minutes so they don’t need to pay as much. With plasma it takes closer to an hour which is why they pay more. A lot of the plasma clinics don’t actually give the plasma to people but instead make drugs from them that they sell for a huge profit

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (6 children)

U.S. healthcare on average is around 2-3x as expensive as countries with socialized healthcare, so if we didn’t have insurance jacking up our prices but also didn’t have insurance for a safety net we can pretend it’s 1/2 to 1/3 the cost of what our procedures cost. A broken bone would still be around $10,000 and if 1/3 of Americans would have to take out a loan for $1000 I’m willing to wager a $10,000 bill would wreck the average person. Other not fun fact is the average American is expected to break 2 bones in their life. The way health insurance works in the U.S. is atrocious but it’s not like if we just got rid of it overnight everyone’s life would be better

view more: next ›