BerenstainsMonster

joined 3 months ago
[–] BerenstainsMonster@kbin.earth 3 points 13 hours ago

Welcome to political organizing.

[–] BerenstainsMonster@kbin.earth 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I think the most effective method is to do some sort of organized boycott. We all know well enough how sheisty these companies are. Time to start encouraging each other to quit them en masse.

 
 
 

Another cross-post from my blog.

There is much ado about fancy mics among musicians and engineers, just as there is much ado about fancy guitars among guitarists. And don’t get me wrong, these instruments can certainly sound inspiring. However, any guitarist worth trusting will tell you that so long as the instrument isn’t unplayable, you can make great music with it (and some have written and even recorded with beater guitars).

It’s not so much about the mic as it is the engineer. Having been through a handful of mics so far, I have not been rid of my “touch” with a microphone. It always sounds like me, whether I like it or not. I’m choosing to let myself like it.

I once heard Tina Weymouth share at a Q&A, “If you have ears, you can make anything sound good, if you’re enjoying it.”

 

Cross-posting this from my blog. You can hear an audio demo of the technique there.

I've been thinking a lot about the importance of silence in music, and I dreamed up this technique, using a sequencer to more-or-less randomly mute a signal. The idea was to program a beat but then have the sequence be periodically interrupted by silence. I was partly inspired by this tai hirose track.

Now you could just as well make cuts by hand, in post, with the mouse. But where's the fun in that? As the title suggests, I wanted something more generative.

In Reaper, we can use Gerraint Luff's MIDI Gate plugin to trigger mutes or gates. Insert it on a track, feed it some MIDI, and depending on the mode, it will mute the channel whenever it receives MIDI information (or whenever it doesn't, if it's in gate mode).

To set this up, I followed Reaper Blog's MIDI Gate tutorial. In short, I programmed a kick drum part, then sent the audio only (not MIDI, which is important) to a receive track, and muted the former track's master output. On the receive track, I inserted a sequencer plugin and the MIDI Gate, one after the other. I made a simple MIDI sequence to trigger the gate. Since my original kick drum pattern was in 4/4, and since I wanted a semi-random sound, my gate trigger sequence was a 3/4 loop, which resulted in polymetric mutes. (Next time I experiment with this, I plan to use a truly random sequencer from Cardinal or something.)

The result is a groovy kick drum part that doesn't finish its sentence sometimes. I did the same on the tops percussion part, experimenting with MIDI Gate in mute mode or gate mode to see which I liked better. For added polish, because I noticed that sometimes MIDI Gate would let just the tiny blip of the first transient through, I inserted a plain old gate plugin next in the chain to cut out any tiny blips below a certain volume threshold. I then added a hi hat loop and played some nylon guitar over it so the track would feel a little more tethered to 4/4.

The neat thing about this semi-generative approach is the element of chance. Sometimes the kick plays where I programmed it to, sometimes not. The trouble with making music in the DAW is having too much control. But the joy is when you can find ways to forfeit that control in ways that are unique to the DAW workflow. Electronic musician Jlin says in an interview, "Not having control and not knowing what I'm going to create is the beauty of how the track is made. Not only the beauty of it, but the, also is the necessity of how, and why it gets made, because I don't have control."

I think your analysis in pretty on point. In my circles, we call this problem "gender essentialism." I see that it stems from neoplatonic thought as derived from Christian puritanism, and it desperately attempts to reconcile a kind of cherry-picked modernism with traditionalism. And it fuckin' sucks.

[–] BerenstainsMonster@kbin.earth 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Transfemme enby here. I hear what you two mean, but I wanna make sure we also resist medicalizing gender nonconformity. While many trans folks undergo bottom surgery to alleviate dysphoria or to simply be "safe" from the scrutiny of the cis gaze, surgery is not what qualifies a trans woman as a woman. The issue isn't about genitalia, it's about transmisogyny.

TERFs have so deeply internalized the misogyny that it's all they know, woman TERFs and man TERFs alike, cis or not ('cause Caitlyn Jenner is still a TERF).

 

Sure! Maybe we can be called Survivors of Poking the Campist Hive lmao.

Alas, I'm not sure how to do that here on Kbin.

[–] BerenstainsMonster@kbin.earth 11 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

First it was fun watching the argument unfold. Now it's annoying lol. Thank you, kind stranger.

 
 
[–] BerenstainsMonster@kbin.earth 11 points 2 weeks ago

My fibro symptoms have been very manageable thanks to better-regulated sleep.

With my therapist, I worked through some self-hate feelings regarding my singing voice (and obliquely related to gender).

A doctor called me back to talk with me about HRT. My sweet partner has been really supportive as I consider if this is something I'd want atm for my transition.

Lately, I'm feeling more creative like I haven't felt since my 3rd year of high school.

There are promising signs of justice and liberation in the news this last week.

 
 
 
[–] BerenstainsMonster@kbin.earth 14 points 2 weeks ago

It's necessary to do more than just put in bike lanes to make for a bike-friendly city.

 
 

Classic. Though my entry to the series was via Need for Pede III: ~~Hot Pursuit~~ Lotsa Foots.

[–] BerenstainsMonster@kbin.earth 10 points 4 weeks ago

Looking through some of these comments and their downvotes and thinking: some need to go back to the "punk" origin of solarpunk, js.

view more: next ›