Amby

joined 1 year ago
 
[–] Amby@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 year ago

Sure bud whatever helps you cope.

[–] Amby@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"white collar" or "clean" bigotry is still bigotry. Someone doesn't need to shout slurs at every possible moment to spread hate and attack people's identitie s or rights to exist.

Bigotry does not need to be tolerated full stop. It doesn't matter how much someone dresses it up to appear palatable or how much someone claims they're "just asking questions/just want a respectful debate" when the topic is someone's immutable identity and right to medical treatment.

[–] Amby@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I don't really feel compelled to engage with such a bad-faith argument but i'll humor you a bit.

In all my research I couldn't find a single study, anywhere, demonstrating an objective quality of life improvement. These would be measurable metrics like: * Life expectance. ** * suicide rate.** * ...

They ask subjects how they feel about suicide. This is an effective proxy for, "are you happy with the major medical procedure you just asked for?" Unsurprisingly, this is subject to enormous bias. Instead I found evidence that *not* transitioning is a much better, much more effective treatment for children.

Followed by 2 links that... don't talk about suicidal ideation but instead about no longer feeling dysphoric.

And then the poster goes on to claim that somehow this reduces suicidal ideation in children who may be trans. This entire section does nothing to address the fact that reaffirming a trans child's gender does, in fact reduce suicidal ideation in trans children. Obviously If a child isn't trans, they won't feel suicidal if they're not allowed to transition.

Just because a thought is well worded and lengthy, does not mean it's worth listening to.

[–] Amby@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 year ago

I don't really feel like explaining what bad-faith arguments are to someone who's clearly concern trolling so I'll just leave it at that.

[–] Amby@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 1 year ago (19 children)

misrepresent data

[–] Amby@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 year ago

Yep that's definitely what I said.

[–] Amby@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (23 children)

You couldn't have cherry-picked a more inflammatory comment to defend. Truly such a shame that people who misrepresent data for the sake of their anti-trans stances have their obvious rage-bait posts removed.

[–] Amby@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago

I don't think anything is inherently wrong with blockchain technology, but what it's been molded into (a purely speculative profit driven ecosystem ) is a waste of it's potential.

1
rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
 
[–] Amby@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 year ago

The crypto side of web3 definitely felt way more "consumerist minded" with the way wallets were able to connect to multiple websites(exchanges) in order to "buy" things(alt/shitcoins). But federated social media feels like a much better use of decentralization so far.