1ns1p1d

joined 1 month ago
[–] 1ns1p1d@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago (10 children)

How so? Why don't you have a real argument instead of hurling crap insults, acid man?

[–] 1ns1p1d@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago (12 children)

"I know how to think critically" insults and belittles

[–] 1ns1p1d@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago (14 children)

I really don't think you would know

[–] 1ns1p1d@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (16 children)

Oh I'm smart enough thank you. Just because you've read an online guide to logical fallacies, doesn't make my personal experience irrelevant, it makes it an anecdote. Its written as food for thought (we're talking zero cases out of multiple thousands of orthopedic gun shot wound injuries). I dont have a duty to refute anything. This isn't debate class. If you want to do that, then why dont we roll back to square one when you mentioned acid attacks as if their prevalence is equal to gun crime in America and that guns would solve the problem somehow. A completely ludicrous claim if ever there was one.

Yawn (asshole)

[–] 1ns1p1d@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (18 children)

What is the bigger problem? Acid attacks or gun crime?

I help fix patients who have been shot. Don't lecture me about solving problems. I'm part of the Violence Intervention and Prevention team - we provide services and assistance to those injured by firearms. I work in a level 1 trauma center in the orthopedic trauma department.

Go ahead and guess how many of those patients have been shot by a good guy with a gun in the past nine years. Go ahead and guess how many good guys with guns end up being the patient.

Here's a hint. The answer to the first question is fewer than 1.

[–] 1ns1p1d@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago (20 children)

I don't even know where to start.

There will be fewer acid attacks with guns because everyone will have access to a way more convenient and easy way of harming each other, yes.

So....problem solved?

Which side of the argument are you actually on?

[–] 1ns1p1d@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (22 children)

This made me laugh. You sound like Philomena Cunk!

Surely, all that needs to happen is that everyone needs to carry bottles of acid. It will be completely safe in the hands of well-trained acid handlers, and accidents will only happen to people who weren't trained well enough! This means you wouldn't even need to regulate it!

[–] 1ns1p1d@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

The best way to stop a good guy with a gun is to shoot first (in countries where there's a good chance you might be shot if you're committing a crime)

[–] 1ns1p1d@lemm.ee -2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (40 children)

It's the entire argument in a nutshell yes. A common-sense response to those desires is what separates the countries that don't have much gun crime from yours.

[–] 1ns1p1d@lemm.ee -5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (43 children)

I choose to protect my body by you not having guns.

Edit: I don't, but I think you can see the error in your argument now.

[–] 1ns1p1d@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

I'm definitely a recent convert. I hate Windows 11 and all the various features it shoves down my throat these days. I bought a steam deck and ended up dabbling in the desktop mode enough to realize the learning process will be mostly fun for me. I'm mostly gaming these days anyway. I don't use the computers I have at home for much more than that.

[–] 1ns1p1d@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I said that Trump better watch out for dancing girls in metal bikinis trying to strangle him with their chains.

view more: ‹ prev next ›