this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
1323 points (95.8% liked)

Science Memes

11047 readers
2884 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 82 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I've always said the dictionary is a follower not a leader, by the time a word gets added to the dictionary it's already established widespread usage

[–] perishthethought@lemm.ee 30 points 4 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 78 points 4 months ago (4 children)

The same rules apply to gods, according to Terry Pratchet

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] corvi@lemm.ee 62 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Gonna go on Countdown with the line “Dictionaries aren’t rule books, they’re record books” and fight Susie Dent.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 12 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Académie Française: <<Ahem -- pardon et moi?>>

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

You mean <<pardonnez moi?>>

"pardon et moi" means "pardon and me". "pardonnez moi" means "pardon me" (in a polite / respectful tense).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] z00s@lemmy.world 51 points 3 months ago (8 children)

The problem is that people frequently use this type of argument when they are unable to spell or follow the basic rules of syntax and grammar instead of simply admitting they're wrong.

Language does change, over time and across many cultures. It doesn't mean that anything you write is automatically correct.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 months ago (10 children)

I'm a descriptivist but that doesn't mean that there aren't rules and that we can't point out things still being wrong.

Descriptivism still describes rules as they're used in the real world. Breaking those rules still subjects the speaker/writer to the consequences: being misunderstood, having the spoken or written sentence to simply be rejected or disregarded, etc.

"Colour" and "color" are both correct spellings of the word, because we are able to describe entire communities who spell things that way. "Culler" is not, because anyone who does spell it that way is immediately corrected, and their written spelling is rejected by the person who receives it. We can describe these rules of that interaction as descriptivists, and still conclude that something is wrong or incorrect.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 51 points 4 months ago (5 children)

I've always been a big advocate of the idea that the only part of communication that matters is communication. If people understand you then congrats you've successfully languaged

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

What if people understand you, but they think you're stupid?

[–] Klear@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago

Congratulations! You did the best you could...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] OpenStars 34 points 4 months ago

Just going to share this little gem again...

img

[–] Eylrid@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I love militant descriptivists

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 months ago

we love you too

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

One thing I learned as an information technology engineer: language is a tool for communication. As long as the sender can send its message unobstructed and as long as the receiver receives and understands the message as intended, the information transmission can be considered a successs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As a l33+ |><|@z0r, I'm here to criticize your command of the English language.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 13 points 4 months ago

You just described 90% of Lemmy users.

[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago (13 children)

And still I maintain that "alot" is not a word.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 months ago (11 children)

I've noticed a tendency of people to combine words that are frequently seen together: "alot", "aswell", "noone", etc.

Some of these catch on, like "nevertheless" and "whatsoever". Maybe eventually "alot" and "noone" will become standard English, too.

[–] DillyDaily@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

The way alot, aswell and noone are combining is expected given how many other words we don't bat an eye at went the same way. "another" is the perfect example, it's just "an other" combined.

It's sort of the reverse of what happened to words like apron and newt.

The division and bracketing of phrases changes over time.

"An apron" is the modern usage of the word "napron", and a newt was originally called an eute. The grammatical need for "a" and/or "an" resulted in the root word being rebracketed and changed.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] sundray@lemmus.org 22 points 4 months ago (4 children)

End prescriptuhvist speling! We haf nuthing to loose butt hour wigly red underlyns!

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Ow. What did I do to you?!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I dig the variety of topics on this comm, and I super appreciate how it doesn't get STEMlordy at all.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 15 points 4 months ago

It's all connected. :)

[–] sxt@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That said I feel like when people are referring to whether or not something "is a word" they're referring to whether not is has seen historical/widespread usage, not "has somebody ever just decided it meant something, somewhere, at some point"

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (3 children)

most often it's said to dismiss people. AAVE gets a lot of that. but it's used to mock and dismiss young people too by the "back in my day" crew.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Great post, I offer my most enthusiastic contrafribularities.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

While that's correct and all, it still irks me when somebody uses a word that has a shorter, older variant. (Gives side-eye to orientated)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 months ago (3 children)

"a language that doesn't adapt to an ever changing society is bound to be lost", sure, but adapt too quickly and you lose the ability to communicate between groups of people.

There needs to be some compromise where new words are adopted, and changed words are accepted, without flooding the language with garbage. For example, English should still be taught in schools, and English teachers should still have the freedom of correcting the writing kids produce, and taking points off for "mistakes".

Like, if you go pure descriptivist, "it's" and "its" can now mean the same thing. There is no ability to distinguish between their, they're and there. A business email describing a product as "cheugy, no cap" is perfectly acceptable and it's up to the reader to figure it out, because every word is a real word and perfectly valid, and every grammar deviation is acceptable because languages evolve.

Even on social media, I think it's fair to push back on "mistakes" that make it hard to understand something. An error that might take a poster 1 second to fix, might cost the world minutes, as thousands of people each take a few seconds to puzzle out what the OP meant to write.

Languages are about communication, and that can suffer whether the language police are too rigid and forbid any deviation, are too easily bribed and allow for anything.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago

Cromulent, by the by, was added to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary in September 2023.

[–] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sgtlion@hexbear.net 12 points 4 months ago

Descriptivists will never haltodulate the hatsrglabatude of us prescriptivists.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (5 children)

I'm old enough to have noticed that a huge amount of language has changed in American English in the Westcoast at least. It's pretty remarkable even myself and other middle aged people I know have changed their word use and slang.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"That's not a word" only applies to scrabble and boggle. Fuck any other context.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Studies linguistics, but not grammar.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sat@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)
[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 19 points 4 months ago

Gen Z slang really pushes my descriptivist tolerance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (7 children)

You know what my biggest problem with ~~descriptivists~~ precriptivists is? What is "correct" always coincides exactly to what they learned in school or university from 15 - 20. It's never anything else. Never in like 20.000 years of human history did we nail language except for that timeframe, and never will it happen again. what a coinkidink.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›