23
I originally thought it was saying people are asking her to step down also.
Hilarious thread!
In this thread: everyone misunderstanding the headline.
This is why democracy is dying.
Jesus Christ, please not her
They're saying she's the one that can convince Biden to drop out. They're not saying she can run.
Oh, ok, thank God.
she reminds me of the face lady from the future in 12 monkeys.
Really? One look and you think this? We really are doomed...
Why not exhume Feinstein while you're at it, holy fuck.
....
Not for her to be a candidate. But waiting to see if she also says Biden needs to step down.
Ah, you're correct. That's a misleading headline, but it's on me for commenting before reading the article.
Or for her to quit as well. There has got to be younger blood anywhere.
I mean, she does.
But there's a zero percent chance thats what the article is talking about. Like maybe they're eyeing her to break the record for most gold medals in an Olympic year.
But why?
Guy's you're right, Biden is unlikable, hated by the right. Let's replace him with someone even less likable that the right and the left hate even more! Sure that is a winning strategy!
Nah, if we're going for a redo, I'm putting all my eggs in the Jimmy Carter basket!
(This is a joke about picking the elderly)
For real though, if they have to pick someone else, could they find someone born after the fifties?
Any 2 Governors from Swing states should be their criteria.
At this point, taking Carter back in his current condition would be an improvement
this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
23 points (67.7% liked)
politics
18998 readers
3618 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS