this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
104 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13535 readers
57 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pisha@hexbear.net 37 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Incredible. The future. I will pay 10 billion dollars to replace my company with this picture.

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 17 points 4 months ago

You joke (probably), but get your customers to sign the right waivers and yes you probably can.

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 28 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Why does he need a stud finder when he can apparently open up the wall and see them?

[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 26 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's difficult to tell the difference between the studs and the sciovs. For more information, see Step Reverse Σ.

[–] the_itsb@hexbear.net 17 points 4 months ago

the studfinder was in his heart all along ❤️

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 months ago

Because the plotholes are necessary for steps 7 and 7-2

[–] booty@hexbear.net 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

my favorite part of the process is drilling the pailot holes so the teletubes can access the shows

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 12 points 4 months ago

Don't you know? The unviewable tv on the wall is a series of tubes.

[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 21 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Asked ChatGPT the same and got this, actually kinda freaky how similar it is:

[–] AernaLingus@hexbear.net 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Poor guy got murked with a drill by his doppelganger and replaced

[–] context@hexbear.net 14 points 4 months ago

it's called step 6 and it's critically necessary to installing the tv properly

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Both of them repeatedly show people standing on top of a stepladder. Maybe the ai is trying to kill us after all?

[–] RoabeArt@hexbear.net 9 points 4 months ago

I get rubber-legged standing on the third highest rung of a tall ladder (the highest rung you can safely put your feet on). I don't know how some people are able to stand on the very top and do their work without a care in the world. One misstep or something collides with the ladder from below and you're fucked.

[–] D61@hexbear.net 13 points 4 months ago

Yes... yes.... almost... oh, oh no, what have you done?

[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Asking an average-taking machine to take the same average twice is going to look pretty similar yeah. It's kinda freaky because it's new and a black box, but the reason it looks similar is hilariously boring. This is the statistical average of TV installation guides.

[–] TheChargedCreeper864@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If an answer this wrong is considered to be the average TV installation guide... just how wrong would an actually wrong one be?

[–] Formerlyfarman@hexbear.net 6 points 4 months ago

Sometimes the average is more wrong, like how the average person has slightly under one testicle.

[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 1 points 4 months ago

Not really, though. Redoing most prompts will frequently deliver very different results, this one was almost panel-for-panel on the first try.

[–] Utter_Karate@hexbear.net 20 points 4 months ago

I know where I'm investing. The market price of sciovs is about to go through the roof!

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is this real? So many specific things were done not just wrong but wrong in the worst wat it reads like satire.

[–] context@hexbear.net 11 points 4 months ago

i dunno i feel like i would've had the tv face outwards for like just the first panel 7 and then turned it back around again

[–] worlds_okayest_mech_pilot@hexbear.net 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean, that is more-or-less how to mount a TV on the wall. Just not a working one.

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 11 points 4 months ago

Technically correct.

[–] the_itsb@hexbear.net 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 18 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] kleeon@hexbear.net 13 points 4 months ago
[–] D61@hexbear.net 16 points 4 months ago

Step 19: Stare in confusion

[–] BoxedFenders@hexbear.net 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A year ago, generative AI could not even conjure up legible text or numbers at all, so this is progress! Just took billions of dollars ($35 billion in 2023!) in training costs. Maybe with the trillions projected to be spent by 2030 it can finally get the instructions right.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 4 points 4 months ago

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10. That's how you're frying the planet - you idiotic meatbags.

[–] Aquilae@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago

Stud finder

[–] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 8 points 4 months ago

Does "palot" mean "glory" in robo-gibberish? (see image 7a)