this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
71 points (96.1% liked)

Privacy

31975 readers
568 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/18581354

Privacy measures apparently helping criminals evade capture

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 76 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I hear cars also get used a lot by criminals. Time to ban this shit.

[–] delirious_owl 2 points 4 months ago

No, no. You have to also please the corporate interests. Besides, most cars the days double as surveillance tools

[–] Canary9341@lemmy.ml 60 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I am not the least bit surprised coming from the authors of the "E2EE must be banned" and the main promoters of the ever lurking chat control law. One thing we have to hand it to europol, they are very transparent in their desire for a police state.

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 4 months ago

Yes. It’s basically about a ban or circumvention of E2EE, as usual. And as usual, this is not an option. Do not throw away your rights to strong, working encryption. Never.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 45 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Computers are hard, can everyone go back to unobfuscated telephone calls and handwritten letters?

  • Cops everywhere
[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 25 points 4 months ago (3 children)

hand-writes a pgp-encrypted message

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Makes me wonder if there are any cyphers that are easy enough that human meat could implement it but hard enough that it would take some serious GPU time to crack?

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

One-time pads require no machines and are unbreakable in theory, though in reality they're a pain to set up and use so people reuse keys out of laziness, making it possible to analyze and decipher encrypted messages.

Security is only as good as its weakest link, and people are morons.

[–] mino@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

I see you Ted Kaczinsky

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Base32 is easy to write down. So there's that for binary data.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 29 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The much more interesting thing this points at is the fact that conversations between people should be privileged and not usable in criminal investigations as long as not one party willfully submits it as evidence.

The mere idea of eavesdropping on people and/or using their data for other purposes than it was intended to is horrendous.

Meaning: if I call a friend or even send them a postcard and ask them for 100 kilos of cocaine, this should not be admissible in court. I dont care if organized crime is a problem. Go pose as a buyer and start rolling up the net from the bottom. Do the footwork.

Otherwise its not europol but more like eustasi. (Reference to the stasi, the former east-german „state security“ which was infamous for picking you up ar night if you as much as said you didnt love the government)

We will have to come to grips with the fact that europol (and for the germans reading this, the german state police) are still the fascism enablers they always have been.

[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If it was up to the police, they would make us badge in and out everytime we leave our homes.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 months ago

And places of worship, cars, stores and offices. We also would be banned from having pockets and not using Apple and Google

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 11 points 4 months ago
[–] mihor@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Europol can eat 💩, they aren't taking away my E2E Encryption!

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

* eat primes

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 months ago

I bet petty crime is the least of EU's problems.

I bet EU has the same level of problems US does with elite deviance, the white-collar guys who want all the marbles, and will start wars, hook eveyone on toxic drugs and wreck the habitat just to own it all and swim in their vault like Scrooge McDuck.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Europol published a position paper today highlighting its concerns around SMS home routing – the technology that allows telcos to continue offering their services when customers visit another country.

If a crime is committed by a Brit in Germany, for example, then German police couldn't issue a request for unencrypted data as they could with a domestic operator such as Deutsche Telekom.

Under home routing, the current investigatory powers of public authorities should be retained and a solution must be found that enables lawful interception of suspects within their territory," reads Europol's paper.

Two possible solutions were suggested, but the wording of the paper clearly favored a legal ban on PETs (service-level encryption) in home routing over making it possible for one EU member state to request the comms from another country.

There is one that was developed for EIOs but cops are concerned this could lead to scenarios where law enforcement efforts are dependent on foreign service providers, which isn't ideal.

"With this position paper, Europol wishes to open the debate on this technical issue, which at present is severely hampering law enforcement's ability to access crucial evidence," it said.


The original article contains 811 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 months ago

Yes the internet is helping people evade the law, let's ban that.