this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

31 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
 

I keep seen everyone recommend FF and Safari, but are there any other options that you would recommend?

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the thing, that's it.

Firefox (Gecko), Chromium (Blink) and Safari (Webkit) are the only serious browser engines left.

Every other remotely relevant browser is just a rehash of these and it's usually from really shady for-profit companies such as Opera or Brave.

[–] nottheengineer@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's also Falkon, which has its own engine, but it's far behind the others. Firefox is the only good choice in my opinion.

[–] Destragras@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] nottheengineer@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks, didn't know that. The name Qtwebengine is a bit misleading.

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

qtwebengine is chromium? I always thought it was webkit..

[–] zhvsrl@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It used to be. This change is also news to me. Really sad tbh.

[–] ono@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

There was qtwebkit, that's where I got the expression from.

[–] zhvsrl@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Like everyone else is saying: there only really are chromium (blink), firefox (gecko) and Safari (WebKit). All other functional modern browsers are based on those. It's best to stick to one of them or a well known fork and customized them to your liking.

[–] cwagner@lemmy.cwagner.me 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Everything else are not full browsers. There’s one (Flow) that’s mainly targeted at selling to TV and set-top box manufacturers, and there’s one that’s a hobby project that evolved from PoC to being useable (Ladybird), but both only support a subset of modern web features.

[–] takeda@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Opera once wasn't as shady and had their own engine. It was quite snappy and low on resources.

It is a shame they didn't open source their engine when they switched to Chrome.

Someone leaked the source code, but of course no one serious will touch it.

[–] Ashiette@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you really want a "full" browser experience, there was konqueror a few years back. I don't know how reliable it is these days.

If you wish for a 'minimal' and lightweight but functional browser experience you can try midori.

[–] falsem@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Fun fact, konqueror is the progenitor of Safari and Chrome.

[–] anderfrank@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

You can get most of Safari through GNOME Web if you're on Linux. You can use various Firefox forks if you don't like Firefox itself.

That's about it, to be honest. Ladybird is being built but it's far from complete yet. You can use Lynx and friends if you want to give terminal only browsing a go. Servo is pretty complete but Mozilla dropped them and development had been affected.

IE, Edge, and Opera all used to have their own browser engine. Now we just have three engines left, two if you ignore the meagre 4% market share Firefox still maintains.