this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
142 points (97.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

30037 readers
310 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bobbing their heads at every step. How ridiculous must have that looked if it was the case.

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] andallthat@lemmy.world 54 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I do see your point, it would probably look funny from a safe distance.... Chicken (especially roosters) can be vicious. Up close, a dinosaur-sized chicken would be freaking terrifying!

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Would you rather fight one T-Rex sized chicken or 100 chicken-sized T-Rex?

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Def 100 chicken sized t-rex, they’re not pack hunters, so you won’t have to deal with a big coordinated attack. Just have to fight the tiny-rex a few at a time.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean, they'd be pretty much like real chickens.

Chicken rules are just prison rules.

You pick the biggest one, and punt it across the yard. Then it attacks the second biggest one and you're done.

If you let one of them attack you first, then the rest are going to want to see how they measure up.

[–] HonkTonkWoman@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Unless you accidentally punt the one that makes the toilet wine… then you’ll have a mess of alch-y chickens looking for your flask & going all puke-a-potamus all over your shoes.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I've played enough Zelda to know that chickens do attack in packs so why wouldn't a T-Rex and how do we know? For all we know they were purple and sang songs.

[–] Aremel@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I saw that documentary. They would even sometimes team up with yellow triceratops.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

You.......attacked the cocos??? YOU MONSTER!!!

Fun fact, Danny Sexbang had ZERO idea about that feature despite playing Link to the Past growing up. It wasn't until Arin Hanson forced him to repeatedly attack them. Then we got to hear Dannys reaction in realtime for the first time ever seeing what happens.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Pack 100 of compsognathus (compsognathii?) says hello.

Not sure how out of date the research is, but in the original Jurassic Park book, there are roaming packs of these things that overwhelm and kill people.

Though the on screen scene of them killing people happens in the second movie, it actually takes place in the first book IIRC... anyway, they're basically depicted as land piranhas.

(Again, IIRC, Jurassic Park the book basically gets set in motion with a family of tourists being eviscerated by a pack of compys... but the first movie dropped this from the story, then when the second movie comes out they basically use this scene as the intro for that, but its on a different island and used to set off an entirely new story?)

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Though the on screen scene of them killing people happens in the second movie, it actually takes place in the first book IIRC...

You do. That’s how John Hammond goes. Falls in a ditch, breaks his leg, and the compys eat him alive. At least that’s what I remember.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Can I fight the mad scientist making these abominations?

[–] dragnucs@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 months ago

Given I have seen how chickens and birds in general fight, I would fight a 100 chucken-sized t-rexes.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

I question whether one should fear a T-Rex or not.

First of all, they may have been scavengers and not predators.

Secondly, would they even bother with something so small as a human even if they were predators? I mean, do lions eat mice? 🤔

[–] Aremel@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

I can't speak to lions and mice, but chickens or even just birds in general will peck at anything smaller than them that moves.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Most scavengers will gladly accept an easy meal, just like chickens will gobble up little bugs they see on the ground without giving it a second thought.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

You eat hamburgers, it's a similar scale comparison

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Would you rather fight 100 chicken sized dinosaur or 1/100th of a dinosaur sized chicken?

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago

I have no idea why people think chickens look stupid when they walk... to me, the way they walk just looks like the way they walk. And the prospect of a T-Rex being that alert and agile is pretty terrifying.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It looks stupid but is insanely effective.

The bobs helps pick out movement, once they pick out prey, they have laser focus and stop bobbing.

If you don't think they're similar, watch a video of a chicken hunting a mouse. It could be a scene out of a very low budget Jurassic Park.

Edit:

Randomly came across a relevant video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfYV39SKIiM

[–] protist@mander.xyz 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Chickens and many other birds appear to bob their heads because their eyes are fixed in their sockets, so they can't fix their eyes on a point while moving, but instead have to keep their head still. What looks like bobbing is the bird pushing its head forward and keeping it completely still for a moment while its body catches up. Without keeping its head still, it wouldn't be able to see much of anything very effectively, prey or predator.

T rex might have been able to move its eyes, in which case it probably wouldn't have bobbed its head.

[–] DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The best is when you pick them up and move their bodies around but their little heads stay in the same spot

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

Nature's own camera stabilizers.

[–] z00s@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)

What I've never been able to wrap my head around is how did they use their tiny arms, and for what?

Only thing I can think of is that they might have used them to brace themselves on the ground while leaning down past their balance point to eat. Doesn't seem like a very useful thing to have arms just for that though

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

🌈 sex 🌈

Unironically... Look it up

[–] Crowfiend@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Man, I decided to do just that, and it was almost exactly what I thought (minus the technical words): if a velociraptor can do a metric fuckle of damage with their two hook-toes, a T-Rex with 2 of those on each hand can fuck something up, presuming it's close enough (which, as the T-Rex head/bite-force, and distance from the jaw suggests), would have been pretty frequently.

Even if each claw only did a little damage, that's still a lot of blood loss throughout the conflict, and the T-Rex would be more likely to win.

[–] FelipeFelop 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They weren’t actually tiny, they were about a metre long. But they do seem out of proportion.

They were very muscular and ended in very sharp talons, so pretty deadly.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

Naturally, they arm wrestled

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

I had thought the recent understanding was they were likely small wings, like emus or ostriches, to help with balance. Angled back instead of forward.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 5 months ago

then donald gennaro would still have a career.