this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
21 points (100.0% liked)

Liberty Hub

268 readers
1 users here now

  1. No Discrimination, this includes usage of slurs or other language intended to promote bigotry
  2. No defending oppressive systems or organizations
  3. No uncivil or rude comments to other users
  4. Discussion, not debate. This community is exclusively for genuine logical debate, any comments using whataboutism or similar will be removed.
  5. No genocide denial or support for genocidal entities. Anyone that supports the mass murder of civilians will be banned.

These guidelines are meant to allow open discussion and ensure leftists and post-leftists can have a voice. If you are here to learn, then welcome! Just remember that if you're not a part of the left (Liberals don't count) then you are a visitor, please do not speak over our members.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone
TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone
21
All the places where it's illegal to be LGBTQ+ – and why it's colonialism's fault (www.thepinknews.com)
submitted 4 months ago by LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/libertyhub@lemmy.blahaj.zone
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I've heard a hypothesis that patriarchy was a tool for redirecting hostility away from the colonizers. Men would get to be rulers over their family, so they'd risk losing that if they challenged the status quo; and women didn't really have the rights to do much, but if they could mount resistance it would be against men. Queer people challenge that whole setup, unless they're too busy trying to survive...

Or maybe it's actually just as simple as conformist societies are easier to control, idk.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 months ago

This is a really interesting hypothesis. It makes so much sense, especially considering how many people I've encountered who still assume we conform to rigid gender roles -- e.g., "Who's the woman in the relationship," etc.