this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
-9 points (33.3% liked)

Privacy

1222 readers
142 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 4 months ago

Yeah, if your platform has opinions then you don't have actual free speech.

Email is free speech.

Mail is free speech.

Talking in a square is free speech.

Talking to friends Is free speech.

Anything where a third party can deny, edit, shadow ban, or delay is not free speech.

Twitter is not free speech

Facebook is not free speech

Whatsapp is not free speech

Newspaper opinion pieces are not free speech

[–] minibyte@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

With the exception of antiX.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

X? As in X11? Or X as in previously twitter? For the former, wayland exists and for the latter, the fediverse exists. Both, I wouldn't consider a security threat.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] minibyte@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

antiX the Debian based Linux distribution.

[–] hunger@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Those evil companies block random users, just because their government made some laws about it.

[–] vitonsky@programming.dev 0 points 4 months ago

There is no matter a motivation of products that play against its users. For the business important only the fact the companies is not reliable.

[–] fzz@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
  1. Мне сложно найти ваше уважение к людям когда вы в как минимум 4 сообщества копипастите один и тот же пост, игнорируя функцию репост, тем самым форся многократно видимость поста, – либо специально, либо по недоразумению, но неприятно;
  2. Софт пишут люди пока что. Жизнь людей в любой точке планеты пропитана политикой. Следовательно требовать (или молить и надеяться) на то, что софт никак не будет подвержен разностороннему политическому влиянию – как минимум наивно;
  3. Далее далёкое от претензий на аксиоматичность ИМХО: Страна, проявляющая агрессию к гражданам не только своей, но и другой страны должна караться всеми возможными методами, любыми, дабы остановить или ослабить агрессию.

Sorry for 🇷🇺 lang. Lang is beautiful, but today it’s associated with some madness and shame.