this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
228 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
6811 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 85 points 5 months ago (8 children)

Smishing is a phishing cybersecurity attack carried out over mobile text messaging. It's also known as SMS phishing.

I had never heard that term before. Is it just a UKism, or am I one of today's lucky 10,000?

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 99 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Not just UK. It’s a stupid term that organizations use in cybersecurity trainings but no one else uses.

[–] FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run 20 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I had to do a security cert last year and it had a bunch of made up sounding crap like that.

[–] Fisk400@feddit.nu 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It feels like one of those where the people that have expertise enough to name new things are not experts in naming things.

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 15 points 5 months ago

I encountered Quishing the other day - the inadvertent scanning of QR codes that take a browser to a malformed URL or site with malware embedded.

Back in my day, it was just called "being a bit dense", especially as most cameras/QR readers will offer you a prompt to go to a website first.

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Developers are notoriously bad at naming anything. Cybersecurity experts are generally developers.

[–] neidu2@feddit.nl 26 points 5 months ago (2 children)

"Smishing" sounds like kiwi slang for playing Smash Bros

[–] martin@lemmy.caliban.io 8 points 5 months ago

We were smishing in the shid!

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 4 points 5 months ago

At the beginning of Smash Bros Ultimate, some people jokingly tried to make "Smush" a thing (since the previous, fourth game, officially Super Smash Bros for 3DS/for Wii U, was often referred to as Sm4sh for short).

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

Yup, those are both the industry terms

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I've worked in IT for 15 years and it's the first time I've heard SMS phishing condensed to smishing. But I specialize in servers and server security, so I'm not too surprised it's a thing.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We're forced to take a cybersecurity online course every year, and I'm constantly confused at what the terms are supposed to mean. Like why is spear phishing a thing? Why do we need specialized terms for every conceivable variation of a concept?

Let's just stick with basic terms:

  • malware - malicious software
  • social engineering - covers calls, texts, emails, etc designed to get access to something they shouldn't
  • cracking - breaking cryptography
  • security hacking - breaking secure systems by exploiting bugs, such as zero-days or unpatched systems, usually to get privilege escalation

I may be missing a couple, but I think most cybersecurity concepts can fit in one of those categories.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, I'm not a cybersec specialist, but my job requires us to comply with NIST cyber security frameworks, including going through external audits every year. In my opinion, your basic generalities are fine for those not working in that field specifically.

However, for cyber security analysts and other specialists, I think specific subcategories are necessary. The reason being, IT is an absolutely massive field that contains a ton of specialties. As such, that means there are roughly an equal variety of malicious actors in the same field.

There's no such thing really as a general "hacker" anymore. Especially when you take into consideration the rapid expansion of state sponsored cyber attacks/warfare. You'll have specialists for various types of:

  • phishing (e.g. targeting general pop/employees, or those going for specific people)
  • cryptography (e.g. those who try to compromise an org's PKI, or people finding vulns to exploit expired certs like what happened with Azure last year)
  • vuln hunters/exploiters (e.g. people that monitor known vulnerabilities and probe orgs' defenses to see if those vulns are present/unpatched/unmitigated, or even people who try to discover new ones)
  • malware engineers (e.g. fairly self explanatory, but malware is a very broad term and can come in numerous shapes and sizes, like even using infected images on a website to conduct RCE on mobile devices like what happened a year or two ago)

Sorry, tangent is getting a bit long-winded now. Anyway, tldr; general terms are fine for laymen or non-specialists, but more precise terms are beneficial for experts in that field.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sure, specialists can and should use specialized terms. But that's not what articles like this are targeting. Keep that to symposiums and whatnot, and keep the general public vernacular simple to avoid confusion. That's all I'm saying.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Fair point. Though, the source is data center dynamics, which does seem a bit niche.

I suppose, but the article has nothing to do with data centers and is written like any other news article on regular news sites. It's a little more tech focused, but still very accessible.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Open Source Security Podcast with Josh Bresher and Kurt Sigfried. It's a pretty good source of news and discussion from a sysadmin perspective.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

When I first read they were sending smishing texts I thought hey this is neat, some kind of kink that I can spend the day learning about, but then I read about the sms phising thing and was disappointed.

[–] paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

So is original phishing supposed to be over the phone? Like it's the email game called emishing or something?

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

When they send the emails at night, it's called nocturnal emishing. It's a serious problem that affects thousands of people each night.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

They were arrested for baiting people with their mast.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

No, phone phishing is phphishing.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Nah phishing is a 90s term though probably coined in reference to phreaking. That started up in the 60s and by the 80s even the US had mostly switched to out of band signalling for their telephone system so none of the stuff worked any more.

[–] AstroTechie@lemdro.id 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

He installed a fake antenna? like a fake cellular radio tower? how is it possible that phones just randomly trust this antenna? they explain very little in the article.

[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] AstroTechie@lemdro.id 3 points 5 months ago

lovely, and my phone won't let me block 2G.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

Short answer: security through obscurity

[–] Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

I've always wanted to broadcast encrypted signals from a ham radio out of the back of a van parked next to a nuclear power station.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

c/randomGerman