this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
57 points (82.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35833 readers
1066 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So considering there’s a substantial push to get away from places like Reddit and Twitter, as an outsider I’m wondering how the fediverse is going to actually provide solutions to some already bad problems within higher resource platforms:

ADMIN/MOD ABUSE: Redditors are no strangers to mods/admins nuking comments, astroturfing, signal boosting/silencing, and so on. Doesn’t that problem just become worse in a federated system? As an example, a subreddit mod may ban users for whatever reason, but a lemmy instance admin could drag all their communities into their own drama if they choose to defederate, no? Losing access to entire instances instead of just one community/subreddit based on a power-tripping admin seems a big flaw. Am I missing something?

REPOSTING/X-POSTING: Reddit was already just the same tweets posted to like forty different subreddits, recycled weekly. On lemmy, there are now a handful of instances that contain virtually the same communities too. The lemmy.world/c/memes and lemm.ee/c/memes communities will post virtually the same content. And that’s just one. Aren’t feeds going to be overrun by duplicate posts in /All?

PRIVACY: I have no clue about this… are there extra security or privacy issues with something like lemmy?

SERVER ISSUES: This kinda goes without saying, but a small instance will already struggle to host even their own local users as traffic increases. Communicating across more and more instances is going to be extremely taxing. Access issues/desyncs seem like they’ll be inevitable. Doesn’t a federated system have more trouble scaling up than a centralized one because of this? How could small independently run servers keep up with exponential processing costs? Won’t this just squeeze out smaller instances? Add this to issues when instances choose to defederate, and you have two competing incentives: spreading out users to keep server stress low, and centralizing users to keep local engagement high. Isn’t this kind of a big hurdle?

Sorry for the wall of text- excited about lemmy in general but really have no idea about whether these are issues.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HandwovenConsensus@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

Lemmy isn't a perfect solution. The problem with Fediverse technologies is that they're not actually decentralized, they're polycentric. As you pointed out, an instance admin can make a lot of trouble for the users of their instance.

However, it is a step in the right direction. The cost of switching from a particular instance to another is fairly low. Your point about reposting supports this argument. If other communities offer the same content, there's no need to tolerate bad administration.

I don't really see reposting as a serious problem. It's a minor annoyance.

Privacy, I don't think the privacy concerns are more serious with lemmy than with something like reddit. Just don't any personal information to your account if you can avoid it.

Server issues, I don't know what the solution is to that.

[–] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Admin abuse: yea, but unlike reddit you can just move to another instance.

Reposting: you don’t have to subscribe to all communities. And you can block communities if you don’t want to see them in your local or all tab.

Privacy: depends on which instance you choose. Do your research.

Server: I am not sure about this, but I think the server strain is placed on the subs who generate the most content / have the most users. More users means more potential for donations, which means the devs can buy better servers.

[–] DrQuint@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Case in point on the admin thing: When the blackout thing started, two instances were the most recommended: Lemmy.ml and Beehaw.org.

Then Beehaw.org defederated from Lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works using some extremely flimsy reasoning ("they have open applications, they're gonna fill with bad peeps uwu")

Instantaneously EVERYONE stopped recommending Beehaw as a home instance. It left everyone's consciousness entirely and you see little amount of communities hosted on it on community recommendation threads as well.

.ml also has potential problems, but people have abstracted themselves from it since, you know, so far the admins didn't allow themselves to get in the way of the usability of their site. Specially not at a critical moment of the Fediverse's growth.

[–] End0fLine@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago

I understand why people keep piling on Beehaw, but it feels to me like the people who make comments like this really don’t understand why they did it. I’m not speaking about the current lack of mod tools, but creating a space like Beehaw invites trolling.

I’m not a member of that server, but completely agree with what they’re out to do.

[–] revoopy@programming.dev 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I haven't been able to get into the "flow" of Lemmy to really enjoy it since joining within the last week but...

Reposting/X-Posting is the thing I'm most worried about. It is the thing that annoyed me most on reddit. Seeing the same post 2 or 3 times on the frontpage at the same time is obnoxious.

[–] UncommentedCode@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Ironically, that was one of the feature I actually really liked. Seeing the same post two or three times didn't really matter to me since if it was posted in different communities, there was a wider variety of responses and perspectives (or I could just scroll past it).

Also it let me discover new communities that I wasn't aware existed.

[–] revoopy@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are we talking about the same kind of post? I'm referring to stuff that doesn't have multiple points of view. Like cat pictures or w/e

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Even with something like a cat picture, I'm on sites like reddit and Lemmy as much for the comments and conversation as I am for the actual content, getting shared to different communities/subs at different times means different people are seeing it, so different stories and trivia and jokes are being shared in the comments even though they're being inspired by the same picture.

And of course, the same picture of a cat being shared to r/aww will have a very different kind of conversation than the same picture shared to a different sub where the point is for people to do something like make up a fake backstory about the picture (not sure such a sub existed, but it very well might have) which would again be very different to if it were shared to r/catsStandingup (Cat.) And if it gets shared to PhotoshopBattles, that's another totally different thing entirely.

Well in these cases, I just scrolled past. It wasn't a common enough occurence for me.

[–] GingerKun@vlemmy.net 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A single "entire" instance being ruined is a much smaller problem than a whole platform.

As for the duplicate community problem, I would love to see either a multi-reddit-like feature or the ability to merge/co-mingle "duplicate" communities across instances.

The solution to tyrannical mods or admins is simple: "take your ball and go home" by starting your own instance, or your own community on a separate instance. That said, instances and communities grow by growing trust between users and mods/admins by a track record of acting in a rational and trustworthy way.

Privacy is definitely a problem for Lemmy. You should assume everything you post or comment is public and in the open, and impossible to fully delete, because it is. Post accordingly. You could theoretically be identified by the sum total of all personally identifying information you freely post over a long enough time or by your writing style if a government considered you a real threat.

That said, many instances do not even require an email address. I don't know whether instances store data like IP addresses, but you could check the lemmy source code to find out.

Edit: But also, who's to say their server source code is unaltered? Federation lives and dies by trust and mutual cooperation, and that cannot be guaranteed.

[–] justdoit@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Fair enough- losing a whole platform is the reason a lot of us are here.

Though I do think that smaller instances with flightier admins are going to experience this issue more frequently. This leaves exclusive communities in the lurch for discoverability if the admin pulls the plug. I’m no server admin expert so I have no idea if this is even a thing, but it’d be cool if communities could choose to be hosted under multiple instances at once. Even just one “secondary” instance that only retains a portion of the activity would help, both with engagement and keeping reposts low.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 year ago

at least with Lemmy, if you’re dealing with a bad admin or mod, you can move to a new instance …

[–] coconutxyz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If we could easily pack our account, subscription and history to another instance the admin abuse will be at least tolerable

[–] justdoit@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Agreed- an annoyance, sure, but it’d be comparable to moving to a similar subreddit

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I believe that this (account and content migration) is already in the roadmap.

[–] aski3252@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ADMIN/MOD ABUSE: Redditors are no strangers to mods/admins nuking comments, astroturfing, signal boosting/silencing, and so on. Doesn’t that problem just become worse in a federated system? As an example, a subreddit mod may ban users for whatever reason, but a lemmy instance admin could drag all their communities into their own drama if they choose to defederate, no? Losing access to entire instances instead of just one community/subreddit based on a power-tripping admin seems a big flaw. Am I missing something?

Yes and no. There are certainly concerns with "little dictators" hosting instances or individuals with an agenda manipulating content on their instance. The difference to a site like reddit or twitter is that this power and influence stops at the instance border, nobody controls lemmy, so people can always migrate to another instance if something like this happens.

And with reddit, admins don't just control individual subreddits. There are of course admins that control all of reddit.

REPOSTING/X-POSTING: Reddit was already just the same tweets posted to like forty different subreddits, recycled weekly. On lemmy, there are now a handful of instances that contain virtually the same communities too. The lemmy.world/c/memes and lemm.ee/c/memes communities will post virtually the same content. And that’s just one. Aren’t feeds going to be overrun by duplicate posts in /All?

This is just an normal characteristic of decentralized services in general and I think it will resolve itself over time. There are of course also many different websites that host similar content and there are similar subreddits that host similar content. Over time, one will establish itself and become the main community.

I have no clue about this… are there extra security or privacy issues with something like lemmy?

Information tends to be more transparent and open on the fediverse. Stuff you post on lemmy is not private. Your personal information you provide when signing-up is of course readable by the person who hosts the instance or people who have admin access. However, at the moment at least, lemmy instances are not run for profit and don't use/sell your data for profit.

There are privacy concerns, there are always privacy concerns. It's important to teach users how to protect themselvs by consciously controlling what information they reveal about themselves. This is much more important and effective than trying to control what others might do with your information.

This kinda goes without saying, but a small instance will already struggle to host even their own local users as traffic increases.

Here I have to speculate because I just don't know enough about the technical side of it. At the moment, most issues seem to be cause by software bugs, not by too much traffic or hardware performance.

Handling high amounts of traffic and activity is always tricky. I believe scalability will probably be an issue that will arise, maybe sooner than later, but I don't think it's an unsolvable issue.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 1 points 1 year ago

Here I have to speculate because I just don’t know enough about the technical side of it. At the moment, most issues seem to be cause by software bugs, not by too much traffic or hardware performance.

Handling high amounts of traffic and activity is always tricky. I believe scalability will probably be an issue that will arise, maybe sooner than later, but I don’t think it’s an unsolvable issue.

I'm running a small instance with around 55 communities/magazines. But, running on kbin. I'm currently getting an average of 5 federation messages a second, of course most of them are like notifications. The LA on the server is 1.55 1.35 1.05 right now, that's with a 16 thread cpu, and the server is also doing a lot of other things. At the current level of traffic, the load of federation at least is negligible.

I only have myself as a user right now though, because for whatever reason my instance doesn't show up in fedidb unless you actually search for it. But it's not in any of the lists they publish of instances they are blocking or hiding.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Overall answer: too early to tell, but we can observe some things.

  1. admin/mod abuse, maybe. If the bigger instances get too censorship-happy, smaller ones have to follow along or get defederated.

  2. Reposting/x-posting, yes, we see this, even when not intentional. Not mentioned: fragmentation of communities across multiple instances. There was a good post about this earlier.

  3. Privacy: yes this is an issue, but mostly less bad than centralized corporate sites like Reddit. I would prefer a self-hosted instance to deal with this, and might put one up sometime.

  4. Server lag: this is an observable problem but I think it is because the current versions of the software are inefficient and/or trying to do too much. The amount of traffic is not that large. NNTP servers 30 years ago carried far more traffic than all the Lemmy instances put together, on computers 1/1000th of the speed and capacity of the bigger Lemmy servers. They were not on the web though (there was no web then). They basically only implemented the equivalent of the API, and let client apps handle the user interface. So they didn't manage subscriptions, upvotes, downvotes, block lists, etc. They just copied messages around. But as a longtime user of that system, I can tell you it was great until trolls and spammers ruined it.

[–] weeabooextract@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We saw admin power abuse just yesterday on lemmynsfw.com . A new admin came in and banned any non-vanilla R34, but more egregiously (if the leaks are to be believed) wants to ban any regular porn if it doesn't come from a "trusted source" and wants people to ID themselves with their government IDs if they are deemed "too young looking" by the moderation.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Do they have a choice? By hosting an instance, they open themselves up to liability if someone posts child porn. What else could they do?

[–] aski3252@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

wants to ban any regular porn if it doesn’t come from a “trusted source” and wants people to ID themselves with their government IDs if they are deemed “too young looking” by the moderation.

So that admin wants to actually make sure that there is only legal and ethical content on their platform? How is that "abuse"? How else are they supposed to protect themselves against legal accusations that they are hosting illegal porn? The admins here aren't working for multimillion dollar corporations, it's probably just a matter of time until corpo social media starts targeting popular instances by exactly this kind of legal action..

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Turns out there might be more to that story, like the draft rules they posted were already rejected by other admins and the one who posted them has been accused of just trying to make trouble.

At this point it's a wait and see situation in my opinion.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Note: what I'm going to say represents my personal beliefs, based on some reasoning. Take it with a grain of salt.

Doesn’t that problem [admin/mod abuse] just become worse in a federated system?

Admins: no, because the admins of any given instance have less power over the whole than the admins of a centralised system, and it's considerably easier to mass migrate across instances than from a centralised site to another.

For a practical example: imagine that your instance admin goes rogue and says "fuck the users, I want profit". Now imagine that the admins of a centralised site do the same.

Mods: the federation itself has a smaller impact on mods than on admins, but it gives them less room for power abuse. Since each instance is smaller, the admins of said instance are more likely to intervene if some of their mods go rogue. And you'll also see more communities around the same topic around instances, so people don't concentrate so much on the same comms as you'd see Reddit users gathering into a single subreddit.

Also note that, while unrelated to the federation itself, Lemmy has built-in transparency tools like mod log. It's harder to be a shitty mod here and get away with it.

Losing access to entire instances instead of just one community/subreddit based on a power-tripping admin seems a big flaw.

It's a fucking big annoyance, but it's a feature, not a flaw. Sometimes the simple threat of defederation forces admins to act (that's actually good).

And, if instance A defederates instance B, members of the instance A lose access to the content of the instance B, and nothing else. (Until they set up alt accounts in instance B to work around it.)

Aren’t feeds going to be overrun by duplicate posts in /All?

So far I don't think that this is a bigger or smaller issue than in Reddit.

I have no clue about this… are there extra security or privacy issues with something like lemmy?

You could argue that privacy is a bigger concern here, indeed, as anything that you post in one instance is hosted in other instances. However, given the nature of social media, you should be already posting with an "anything that I post here is publically available" mindset, be it here or in Twitter or Reddit or Facebook or any other place.

Server issues

I'm ignorant on the technical side of the things, so I won't voice my take on this.

[–] nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The issue will come if your beloved communities are in different instances defederated from each other. You will have to move to a instance were those are not defederated. So it’s crucial to have the option to migrate our user easily through instances. I read its feature that’s coming . At some point it is the best solution to be decentralized in a difficult scenario as a social link aggregator and discussion platform. I’m mostly worried about the actual data and content that will be wiped if a instance dies because the admin decides to delete it all. There should be a a protection on that. My other concern is privacy too, it’s pretty easy to track users activity from inside and outside. On this point is our responsibility to take measures and take care of our IPs and emails which are the two points any entity Can point to our real identity. For this, VPN and email aliases. I see the whole thing very hard to use for those internet users that don’t want to bother and just scroll . But at some point that would split the waters between poor and rich quality of users.

[–] anteaters@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

If a community you like gets defederated from your home instance you can also create an account on the communitie's instance instead of migrating your old account to an instance that federates with exactly what you are looking for.

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeh Lemmy is unfortunately going to have a very hard time growing to be even 10% the size of reddit. The whole decentralized thing is good in theory, but not great in reality. As you said, now entire communities can be deleted at any time, and as it gets more popular it will cost more people more money and with no way to make money to cover ever increasing server cots other than donations. Also there's not going to be any guaranteed performance level across instances because they're not all hosted on the same hardware in the same locations.

I want reddit to crash and burn at this stage, but unfortunately I can't see it happening. Lemmy will crash and burn if it were to actually become a reddit competitor. I've already seen people asking for registrations to be turned off because most servers can't even handle the minimal number of users they now have! That's not how you grow a website/community lol.

Also as you mentioned, mods is a big worry. Mods are the main problem with reddit IMO, along with the admins. They push their ideologies, they shadow delete and ban people that they don't like/agree with, and they just wield the banhammer without warning and without consequence. Are the mods here going to be the same? Many of them will literally be the same people that were mods on reddit, so that's not a good start.

[–] Olap@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If lemmy stays under 10% of reddit we all win

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Not really. We need the content that comes from having a big community.

load more comments
view more: next ›