this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
28 points (96.7% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

45 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

For the last few years franchise movies like star wars, marvel, etc. made money regardless of quality. However now it seems like audiences are being choosier when it comes to these kinds of tentpole releases. I've seen some people online say that the movie/theater industry is losing people in general but I don't think that's the case.

Super Mario and spiderverse made a lot of money. And Oppenheimer, Barbie, and Dune seem to be tracking well. I think the problem is that people are getting sick of the same old stuff and need more than just a brand name to go to the theater. What do you you think?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BobQuasit@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's not superhero fatigue or franchise fatigue. It's bad writing fatigue. Seriously, I don't know why Hollywood keeps choosing terrible writers for huge projects, but as long as they are doing that they are going to keep getting what they deserve.

And speaking of huge projects, from what I've heard Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny cost $295 million to make rather than 250. And that's not counting publicity and marketing, which brings it to 400 million if not more. That means they need to make at least $800 million to break even. No matter how you slice their opening weekend, they are in huge trouble. And given that Elementals and The Little Mermaid both bombed hard along with most other Disney movies of the last few years, I'd say that Disney is in serious trouble too!

On the other hand, Guardians of the Galaxy 3 was rather well written, and from what I've heard it did rather well at the box office. Which is just more evidence that if you have a decently-written film the public WILL go and see it. We're just avoiding crap, that's all.

I'll go out on a limb and say that hauling poor old Harrison Ford away from his bong and forcing him at the age of 80 to make shitty movies is tantamount to elder abuse. As for The Flash, coddling wannabe cult leader and mental defective Ezra Miller was just the icing on the cake. The movie was just badly written.

Frantic last minute reshoots and rewrites are a dead giveaway that something is seriously wrong with a production. But that that is happening so often in Hollywood in the last several years is clear evidence that Hollywood itself has completely lost their way. I don't know if they can right that ship, and to be honest I don't much care. If they won't provide people with the good entertainment that they want, eventually somewhere else will. Maybe Bollywood or China.

[–] Granite@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

As someone in the industry, the tentpole execs do not give a shit about writing or even quality. They just imagine $$$ and hate risk, so they double down on what they already know. It’s a dumb decision from the outside looking in, but they literally can’t see that. Also, in the last 10-15 years, screenwriting has developed more into a gig economy than a FT job, so even finding good writers and keeping them around is tough as hell.

[–] basic_spud@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Speak for yourself. I've been majorly burned out on super hero movies.

[–] june@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I think Flash and Indiana Jones flopped because they’re garbage. Spider-Verse was a masterpiece and clearly a part of the shared universe franchise. Guardians 3 is nearing a billion dollars at the box office.

People aren’t tired of franchises, franchises are just generally getting worse. MCU is a mixed bag with some outliers still doing really well. We’ll see if the new phase can keep up with the introduction of new characters that most people don’t know. But I’m honestly not terribly hopeful.

[–] wolfteeth@lemmy.film 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i would love to see revivals of old franchises go the way of the dodo. i am as nostalgic as any millennial but if i want to see indiana jones or ghostbusters or whatever, i'll just watch the originals.

i don't think the superhero franchises are going anywhere, unfortunately. they are still reliable, even with some people losing interest over time. it seems like a good moneymaking bet for disney at least. and all the studios seem really risk-averse lately, more than they used to be.

[–] Deed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd more interested in MCU stuff if they tried something new with them. It's why guardians as a franchise did so well. The cracks really started showing id argue with captain marvel.

[–] wolfteeth@lemmy.film 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm just bored of superheroes in general, I think. I watched up to the first Avengers movie as they came out, and kind of lost interest after that. GotG was fun, and I liked the first Black Panther. Loved Thor: Ragnarok. There's just probably a limit to how much someone can do with that set of concepts without getting repetitive.

[–] Deed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's more to me because of the studios interfering. Its worse with wb and DC but like cause it's a overarching universe each individual projects suffers creatively because of it.

[–] wolfteeth@lemmy.film 1 points 1 year ago

I haven't bothered with DC movies since Wonder Woman (2017). It was an OK movie, and then I stepped outside and forgot about it. So I can't speak to how bad those movies are, haha. With Marvel, I do think the quality is good, it's just that I'm not interested anymore. I have a hard time understanding how anyone is still excited after 15 continuous years of the same stuff.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Indy is failing not because it's a franchise, but because the audience for an 80 year old Harrison Ford is not going to the theater.

Flash failed for reasons other than it being part of a franchise. It failed because that franchise is not well liked, and in fact is in the process of being replaced.

Also, Ezra Miller is apparently a giant dick bag, turning off audiences.

I expect Blue Beetle will do worse due to featuring a character 90% of the movie going audience is unaware of, based on characters 99.9% are unaware of. At best people will go "So it's an Iron Man / Spider-Man ripoff?"

Aquaman is the last of this generation of DC movies, hard to tell how it will turn out. The first one was the ONLY ONE of the DC films to hit the big $Billion mark.

Man of Steel - $668M
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0770828/?ref_=bo_se_r_1

Batman V Superman - $873M
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt2975590/?ref_=bo_se_r_1

Suicide Squad - $746M
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt1386697/?ref_=bo_se_r_1

Wonder Woman - $822M
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0451279/?ref_=bo_se_r_1

Justice League - $657M
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0974015/?ref_=bo_se_r_1

Aquaman - $1.148B
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt1477834/?ref_=bo_se_r_1

Shazam - $367M
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0448115/?ref_=bo_se_r_1

Birds of Prey - $205M
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt7713068/?ref_=bo_se_r_1

Wonder Woman 1984 - $169M
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt7126948/?ref_=bo_se_r_2

The Suicide Squad - $168M
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt6334354/?ref_=bo_se_r_1

Black Adam - $393M
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt6443346/?ref_=bo_se_r_1

Shazam: Fury of the Gods - $133M
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt10151854/?ref_=bo_se_r_2

The Flash - $245M and counting:
https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt0439572/?ref_=bo_se_r_1

Edit I should say, both Birds of Prey and the Suicide Squad deserved better. Victims of covid and day/date streaming.

WW84 can die in a fire though.

[–] chickenwing@lemmy.film 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair point about DC and Indy but Disney has had a few flops recently as well. Pixar isn't a franchise but it was definitely a brand that normally would bring people to the theaters with just the name alone. Now they are struggling to get people to come to the theaters.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Oh, definitely. In my mind Pixar hasn't had a really good movie since Coco.

[–] regeya@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I want to see Indiana Jones but I've had stuff to do every day since it came out. I might bite the bullet and go tomorrow.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

No spoilers, for me it felt like it was cutting bits and pieces from the original films and remixing them.

"Oh, this is just like that bit from Raiders where Marian gets kidnapped... Oh, hey, that's like when the tank ground up against the wall..."

There's entirely too much of "Well if you liked that, you'll probably like this..." moments.

Which isn't always bad, but it doesn't generate new memories so much as throw back to the others.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think Ezra Miller is a great actor, but in small indie films, where he can act the problematic individual he's outside the screen. Whorever decided to cast him off for big budget summer blockbusters should be fired.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

They actually did a decent job in the Flash. It's tricky playing an 18/19 year old version of the main adult character on screen at the same time.

[–] VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, in their defense, The Flash was first filmed way before he got super problematic iirc.

I also thought it wasn't too bad, but I seem to be in the minority apparently lol. My biggest complaint is some moments of bad CGI.

[–] MonitorZero@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Nah movies are too expensive now. I'm super excited for indy. He's my hero but the theater is a horrible money waste.

They need to learn to release straight to streaming instead of Theatre only. Because I spent a while lot of money on a 5.1, 65in 4k TV and awesome lighting to go blow $100 every time I want to see a new release? Hell no. The threater is just more irrelevant then ever when I can be super comfy and watch or be packed in with 100 strangers.

[–] manapropos@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

I saw the movie last weekend and paid about $10USD for 2 tickets, sodas and popcorn. Mexico is a beautiful place

[–] VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's still a place for theaters for people in apartments or condos who can't set up home theaters without bothering their neighbors... Unfortunately. Damn you high home prices 😭

[–] theUnlikely@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

How expensive are those tickets?!

[–] Ducks@ducks.dev 3 points 1 year ago

I don't think it has anything to do with being franchise films. Studios just need to make good films and people will see them.

Spider-Man made 600m WW so far which isn't too shabby. That has to contend with superhero fatigue as well as franchise fatigue.

[–] Apollonius_Cone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand the apathy for Indiana Jones. It was a great film. Very entertaining and fun and was dedicated to the previous films. Some very touching moments. Maybe people want to wait until it comes out on a streaming service rather than watch it on the big screen. The big screen experience was worth it with lots of action scenes and Harrison being de-aged and fighting Nazi's, what's not to love.

[–] yankeegiant185@lemmy.fmhy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's because 4 was bad and it's hard to believe that 80yr old Indy is still doing anything. Throw in the wonkiness of de aging and it's not exactly an attractive use of time.

[–] jimmeth@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Also a really really stupid name imo

[–] Apollonius_Cone@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The traction that films with older actors such as Grumpy Old Men have limited appeal due to the age of the actual actor. I guess as I get older I just want to see my favourite actor in anything regardless of age. However, the expectation and delivery of entertainment is still there. I guess what George Lucas and Steven Speilberg have always tried to accomplish with their movie making is to grasp some of the anticipatory excitement that they garnered as children watching serials at the Bijou. Sure its campy and all in all mildly unbelievable, but the action delivers and so does the entertainment. The ability to escape was there.

[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it’s just more expensive than ever to go watch a movie. I like going to this one theater because it has comfy seats, they serve beer, and have good sound. The tickets are like $12-18, but I also have to pay for parking (about $30 for a 2-3 hour movie), and they up charge the beers too. So, going to watch a movie ends up being around $60-70 for two, and the only reason to go is to be part of the social experience happening around the movie, because if you wait like 90 days, you can buy the movie on iTunes or YouTube for less than $60.

So I pretty much only go to Marvel movies since the cgi action scenes are better on the huge screen.

[–] ddugue@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dune was incredible in theaters. I'm scared of watching it again at home (in prep for the 2nd part) since I'm probably going to be disappointed

[–] 98codes@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Proper surround sound with subwoofer required, to be sure

[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I can imagine. I skipped it but watched it later on my phone. Definitely want to go see part 2 in theaters.

[–] echoplex21@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

End of franchise films ? Not even close. What I think you’re seeing now is the floor is much lower for franchise films than before (especially with comic book movies). You need more than “it’s a Marvel movie” to have people go out and come see. The top movies of the year are still either sequels to franchises or based on existing IP.

[–] chickenwing@lemmy.film 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's true. I should have titled the end of the "risk free" franchise film. Disney and WB drop 200 million on a movie and start filming without a coherent script because they knew that the film would coast on the name alone. I think those days might be gone. Marvel and others might need to step up their game to survive.

[–] echoplex21@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Agreed completely. Writing and Direction are key and studios will definitely need to recognize that (ironic considering the writers are still in strike).

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Out of the loop, why is there a writers' strike?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InfiniWheel@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Its 5head marketing for Oppenheimer

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I heard bad things about the last Indiana Jones, so I won't see the latest one as I would feel like I was missing out on something. Same goes with the Flash... the films don't come across as independent from each other so I won't bother if it seems like I need to have followed the franchise until that point.

[–] StoicSpork@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't think people are sick of the same old stuff. Indy flopped at the box office on the combination of a disappointing 4th movie and Disney's trend of virtue signalling over good characterization and storytelling.

The Flash has the baggage of an unlikeable lead actor, plus the DCU is still all over the place and constantly rebooted. I honestly have no idea what to expect from the Flash, given previous DCU movies.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Littleborat@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There are only two good indy movies and that's raiders and the last crusade.

Anything else was crap and crap Indiana Jones movies are nothing new.

Dune and so on are objectively good movies even though they play the hobbit tactic with dune releasing only half the book.

Why people like avengers and marvel and these movies I have no idea. Only a select few of these movies are watchable.

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

No, Indiana Jones is a terrible example to base those on. It's a franchise who's last good film was in the 80s and most people hated the last attempted comeback.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Slightly off-topic, but didn't they claim something along the lines of "people will ignore that Ezra is a total piece of shit because of how great the movie is"?

[–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow, you got me to Google the guy. I was expecting a bad incident or two, but the list just goes on and on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kingmongoose7877@lemmy.film 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Could this be the beginning of the end for franchise films?

We can only hope.

'The Flash' and Other Mediocre Movies Won't Stop Superhero Fatigue - Variety. Fifteen years (since Iron Man), for the love of Stan! As Scorsese said, "…that’s not cinema…the closest I can think of them…is theme parks."

Fun fact: did you know that the (then) new distribution strategy invented for the iconic film The Godfather gave rise of the Blockbuster (and thus "franchise movies") and the near-death of auteur cinema?

!moviesnob@lemmy.film

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] copium@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Genuine question, how do you know Indians jones flipped hard ?
I went on imdb and it is rated around 7 which isn’t bad at all.

[–] finthechat@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Critic and audience reviews (such as IMDB scores) alone don't make a movie a flop or not. Instead, it's the movie's box office performance.

$60M opening weekend against a $250M production budget would be considered a flop. (Source)

Typically, studios want to see at least $100M on their opening weekend to consider something a success.

[–] wheresbicki@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe Film studios should make more effort on lower budget movies instead of reviving old franchises and making commercial movies (Air, Blackberry, Barbie, Mario, etc).

[–] Polydextrous@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

These capitalist hero stories drive me nuts. Between air, Tetris, Uber, and all of these “one white guy + the system vs not making billions of dollars” movies, it’s like capitalist propaganda when more people than ever are having unfavorable views of capitalism. It bugs me other people in my life go to see them

load more comments
view more: next ›