this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
105 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

1383 readers
422 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The company is trying to win back trust after last week’s backlash.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 41 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Edit: Updated image to the latest version.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 9 points 5 months ago

Very nice list, thanks for sharing. I hadn't heard of a lot of these.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Holy shit. Thank you (and the author) so much for avoiding yellow/red/green icons. This is colorblind friendly!!

[–] dukatos@lemm.ee 25 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

People realized alternatives exist?

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] recursive_recursion@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Thanks, I will check them out!

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

GIMP can handle a lot of cases for PDFs. For more complicated cases, I would recommend Scribus.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 months ago

Libreoffice Draw also works well for PDFs.

[–] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Oh wow, never thought to open them in GIMP. I will have to give that a shot.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Affinity suite (designer, photo, and publisher) are pro level, pay to own, and much less expensive

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Serif/Affinity got bought out by a pump'n'dump subscription company. We'll see if things hold true moving forward...

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Was that the concern, though? I thought the controversy was that they intended to moderate people's projects. Or did they walk that back too once they renounced the reason for that policy (I.e., training AI)?

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That was also a concern, it's both.

[–] kakes@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

Yeesh, they really dove into that with both feet eh?

[–] Veraxus@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

That they would/could access my work for any reason whatsoever… that they even have that ability, that’s not just a line in the sand for me, it’s the Grand Canyon. I expect any kind of cloud storage to be private and protected (e.g. encrypted at rest)… no back doors, no exceptions.

This is beyond the pale, and AI was never part of the concern.

[–] Dbumba@hexbear.net 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We pwomise we're swawwy 🥺👉👈

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 2 points 5 months ago

Yeah, basically this.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"We have never trained generative AI on our customer’s content, we have never taken ownership of a customer’s work, and we have never allowed access to customer content beyond what’s legally required,” Wadhwani said to The Verge.

" yet..."

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 months ago

It's not even completely true. They did train their AI on Adobe Stock, which is royalty free, but is by definition customer content.

[–] 555@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

… anymore*

[–] fox@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago

I know adobe has particularly smooth brained execs but this seemed like a blatantly obvious bad idea. Adobe software is used by every big company and they do not have the resources to field five thousand lawsuits from everyone in the Fortune 500 simultaneously