5
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BluefoxLongtail@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago

This is a cool technology, making the assumption that it's real, but due to cost and scaling limitations, I doubt we'll see it outside of specialized use cases any time soon. For expensive use cases that have unique cases for it, it might prove interesting.

[-] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I belive it, but the article mentions that the tech requires non-silicon semiconductors (enormously expensive to scale right now, think of how expensive building current-gen fabs is, and tack on the cost of experimental tech) not to mention the fact that changing the memory architecture to merge RAM and long-term storage would require significantly altered CPU design, (and probably significant OS/Kernel changes too!)

TL;DR assuming that this is real and not wierd shareholder fluff like other commenters assume, we probably won’t see it in consumer hardware (or even enterprise stuff) for a long time

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

yeah, ferroelectric RAM (F-RAM) has been a thing for a while. it's persistent (nonvolatile), faster than DRAM, and more write endurant than flash. it's not some top secret government technology either -- you can just go buy it on digikey right now. the problem is that 512KB F-RAM modules are $20 a chip and ain't nobody building a computer out of THAT

[-] Lojcs@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

No mention of capacity or costs. Kinda sus

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Furry Technologists

1296 readers
6 users here now

Science, Technology, and pawbs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS